# Things confirmed in the last hour or so:

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-confirmed-in-the-last-hour-or-so/101094>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [May 10, 2016, 6:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-confirmed-in-the-last-hour-or-so/101094 "2016-05-10T18:02:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShadowBeast005](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/71c47a/32.png) [@ShadowBeast005](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ShadowBeast005)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 10:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-confirmed-in-the-last-hour-or-so/101094/81 "2016-05-11T22:23:00Z")

</div>

> [@vizionblind](#):
>
> Server Browser  
> Weapon attachments authentic to the era  
> Dynamic vehicle damage model, which affects said vehicles for example destroying the wing of a plane  
> Various Navy vessels

if i can loose a chunk of my planes wing that is going to make me unbelievably happy, i know you could loose part of the hogs wing in bf4 but it dint really effect anything

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NatsuTerran](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/898d66/32.png) [@NatsuTerran](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/NatsuTerran)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2016, 10:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-confirmed-in-the-last-hour-or-so/101094/82 "2016-05-11T22:24:00Z")

</div>

BF3 wasn’t that bloated, but BF4 seemed to have way too many sprinkles on top. Things like the SUAV, UCAV, and tons of attachments seemed very extraneous and did not add depth.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-confirmed-in-the-last-hour-or-so/101094.md?page=4)