# Things that should be added to Battlefield 5 **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [July 13, 2019, 10:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076 "2019-07-13T22:50:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 12\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/noodlesocks/32/101045_2.png) [@Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Noodlesocks)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 1:30am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/21 "2019-07-21T01:30:00Z")
1x sights for recon. ---
**Author:** ![FPSJBond007](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/fpsjbond007/32/106606_2.png) [@FPSJBond007](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/FPSJBond007)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 1:41am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/22 "2019-07-21T01:41:00Z")
> [@y\_j\_es\_i](#): > > > [@Acknod](#): > > > > FPSJBond007 said: > > Lets be honest Battlefield 5, is not the best game, it doesn’t mean that there is room for improvements. I know that there are new weapons being added to the game, but here is what I think should be added to the game, starting with infantry weapons: > > > > - M1 Garand > > - M1 Carbine (Non-paratrooper model) > > - M1918A2 Browning Automatic Rifle > > - Browning 1919A4 > > - Springfield M1903 > > - Mosin Nagant 90/31 > > > > Next Vehicles: > > > > - Willys Jeep > > - Panzer III > > - StuG III > > - Tiger II > > - Sherman Firefly > > - M3 Lee > > - M3 Stuart > > - Ferdinand/Elefant > > - Panther > > - M10 Wolverine > > -M26 Pershing > > > > Emplacements: > > > > - 8.8 cm Flak 36 > > - M5 3-inch Anti-Tank gun > > - M2 .50 cal > > - Bofors 40mm > > > > Aircraft: > > > > - P-40 Kittyhawk > > - Fw 190 > > - Hawker Hurricane > > - SDB Dauntless > > - Wellington > > - Swordfish > > > > Lastly Squad Reinforcements: > > > > - Sherman Galliope > > - Messerschmitt Me 262 > > - Gloster Meteor > > - Panzerwerfer > > > > But why so much American technology, if this is the beginning of the war and the American technology here can not be > > Chances are it’s because OP’s American and can’t name that many japanese and Russian guns OP is American. I can name very few Russian and Japanese guns. ---
**Author:** ![FPSJBond007](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/fpsjbond007/32/106606_2.png) [@FPSJBond007](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/FPSJBond007)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 1:43am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/23 "2019-07-21T01:43:00Z")
> [@CoD\_Is\_Number\_1](#): > > The Italians, with an Italian theatre > The Russians with an Eastern European theatre (I suspect this will happen soon enough) > > Would be nice. More famous maps, famous battles. Bored of this unknown stuff, it doesn’t interest a lot of people, myself included. No Italians, the Italians surrendered then changed sides. Italians just make pasta, and pizza for everyone. ---
**Author:** ![sabootheshaman](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sabootheshaman/32/103347_2.png) [@sabootheshaman](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/sabootheshaman)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 2:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/24 "2019-07-21T02:31:00Z")
> [@FPSJBond007](#): > > CoD\_Is\_Number\_1 said: > The Italians, with an Italian theatreThe Russians with an Eastern European theatre (I suspect this will happen soon enough) > Would be nice. More famous maps, famous battles. Bored of this unknown stuff, it doesn’t interest a lot of people, myself included. > > No Italians, the Italians surrendered then changed sides. Italians just make pasta, and pizza for everyone. And Americans deserved what they got on 9/11. ---
**Author:** ![StarscreamUK](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/a87d85/32.png) [@StarscreamUK](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/StarscreamUK)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 4:50am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/25 "2019-07-21T04:50:00Z")
For that quite blatant flame baiting, you are gone for a week. ---
**Author:** ![xKusagamix](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/xkusagamix/32/104118_2.png) [@xKusagamix](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/xKusagamix)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 5:04am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/26 "2019-07-21T05:04:00Z")
A working anti-cheaters program. ---
**Author:** ![PvtJohnTowle](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/pvtjohntowle/32/103189_2.png) [@PvtJohnTowle](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PvtJohnTowle)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 7:08am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/27 "2019-07-21T07:08:00Z")
> [@sabootheshaman](#): > > > [@PvtJohnTowle](#): > > > > [»] > > > > > [@bunningsSnagz](#): > > > > > > [»] > > > TheGM86 said: > > > > > > Acknod said: > > > > > > But why so much American technology, if this is the beginning of the war and the American technology here can not be > > > > > > Because we care about things looking authentic right… > > > Preview > > > > > > Whats the mater with all that gear? that art looks sweet! > > > > Maybe for a fashion show in the 21st century but this is supposed to WW2 in the 40’s and none of that gear looks remotely authentic. There is no soul of WW2 with BFV > > > > What the hell is the camera around the neck of the first chick? Is that to capture the lag and stuttering during gameplay? Is it for taking selfies in the heat of battle? > > > > Oh the green feather in her beret too. Probably easier to spot her due to the poor visibility in the game. Maybe it gives off some glow in the dark. > > > > Don’t get me started on the middle character who is carrying a man bag on his shoulder. Would never happen in WW2. How would he shoot with this hanging off his shoulder? He would have to keep putting it down. > > > > Who is designing these ridiculous looking monstrosities? They haven’t got a clue. Next we will see the female “soldier” carrying a make up case. > > > > BFV has just become a bad joke and an embarrassment in the gaming community. Needs to die a quick death. > > Didn’t the Black Watch dress like that? Besides the camera and gender(which I’m cool with) I think it might be relatively ok. No [https://www.theblackwatch.co.uk/history-and-research/black-watch-history/second-world-war/](https://www.theblackwatch.co.uk/history-and-research/black-watch-history/second-world-war/) ---
**Author:** ![Trokey66](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/trokey66/32/103889_2.png) [@Trokey66](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Trokey66)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 10:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/28 "2019-07-21T10:45:00Z")
> [@PvtJohnTowle](#): > > sabootheshaman said: > > PvtJohnTowle wrote: » > > bunningsSnagz wrote: » > TheGM86 said: > > Acknod said: > > But why so much American technology, if this is the beginning of the war and the American technology here can not be > > Because we care about things looking authentic right… > > Preview > > Whats the mater with all that gear? that art looks sweet! > > Maybe for a fashion show in the 21st century but this is supposed to WW2 in the 40’s and none of that gear looks remotely authentic. There is no soul of WW2 with BFV > > What the hell is the camera around the neck of the first chick? Is that to capture the lag and stuttering during gameplay? Is it for taking selfies in the heat of battle? > > Oh the green feather in her beret too. Probably easier to spot her due to the poor visibility in the game. Maybe it gives off some glow in the dark. > > Don’t get me started on the middle character who is carrying a man bag on his shoulder. Would never happen in WW2. How would he shoot with this hanging off his shoulder? He would have to keep putting it down. > > Who is designing these ridiculous looking monstrosities? They haven’t got a clue. Next we will see the female “soldier” carrying a make up case. > > BFV has just become a bad joke and an embarrassment in the gaming community. Needs to die a quick death. > > Didn’t the Black Watch dress like that? Besides the camera and gender(which I’m cool with) I think it might be relatively ok. > > No > > [https://www.theblackwatch.co.uk/history-and-research/black-watch-history/second-world-war/](https://www.theblackwatch.co.uk/history-and-research/black-watch-history/second-world-war/) But many British regiments did use hackles, including green. (mostly Irish)… [https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/24906862247](https://www.flickr.com/photos/38535102@N04/24906862247) And as to ‘man bag’, it is no doubt based on a General purpose ammo bag or gas mask bag. ---
**Author:** ![Mangrey](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/439d5e/32.png) [@Mangrey](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Mangrey)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 12:04pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/29 "2019-07-21T12:04:00Z")
> [@Noodlesocks](#): > > 1x sights for recon. Well that would be for all but the recons ---
**Author:** ![bigiain](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/c4cdca/32.png) [@bigiain](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/bigiain)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 12:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/30 "2019-07-21T12:31:00Z")
I think the beret and jumper combo is inspired by Lord Lovatt on D-day, relieving the glider troops at Pegasus Bridge. Looks similar to Peter Lawford in The Longest Day anyway. ---
**Author:** ![Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@Woodlbrad](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Woodlbrad)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 1:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/31 "2019-07-21T13:21:00Z")
> [@FPSJBond007](#): > > Woodlbrad said: > Mortars. > > No mortars. They were used in ww2 by pretty much every country involved is this not a ww2 title? Apparently not. ---
**Author:** ![Broliszibaila](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/7ab992/32.png) [@Broliszibaila](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Broliszibaila)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2019, 2:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076/32 "2019-07-21T14:22:00Z")
> [@PvtJohnTowle](#): > > I have a better idea how about just scrap everything and start from scratch and give as a realistic WW2 FPS without all the bugs and glitches? Why not just reskin BF1 ‘cos at least it works and we half of its weapons already Yep! You can easily make WW2 battle for Poland. BF1 has cavalry which could be added into Polish army and make same unique factions. Also trains were used in the WW2… I cant believe how these EDUCATED devs missed such opportunity to make MUST HAVE WW2 game. Now its just a joke and target of the jokes. Im sad and mad. [Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/things-that-should-be-added-to-battlefield-5/107076.md?page=1)