This game is a sinking ship. The deluxe content is utterly embarrassing.

Khronikos · February 28, 2019, 3:43pm

BFV is for all intents and purposes dying a slow to medium rate death.

They have some stuff coming up in March here that I think people are waiting for, but I don’t think this game is doing that well overall as far as players sticking with it.

I was literally addicted to BF1. My favorite shooter in years. And to quit the next iteration this fast is pretty telling.

MAJWolfcookies · March 1, 2019, 4:55am

Nobody cares about what’s coming out in March. The game is still broken on many fronts and instead of fixing, they released a co-op mode. Co-op mode!!! Who’s in charge???

llPhantom_Limbll · March 1, 2019, 5:27am

Well coop would have been good if it hasn’t been done in such a cheap and brainless way. I bet a couple guys at Dice made it during their spare time.

disposalist · March 1, 2019, 10:40am

Was it BF3 where there was a coop campaign? LOVED doing that so much I repeated it with several friends. Remembering one section where your buddy runs down one side of a city canal and you are on the other providing cover fire? Awesome.

KPNuts74 · March 1, 2019, 11:43am

Deluxe edition was just for 5 day early access as far as I am concerned (and I was happy with that!)

llPhantom_Limbll · March 1, 2019, 11:52am

bf3 had a proper co-op missions. In bfv those were done just because Dice promised them but the same time quality wasn’t promised so it ended up being a very poor experience.

fisknyllet17 · March 1, 2019, 12:41pm

Loved those missions.

warslag · March 1, 2019, 2:11pm

They were great. The one in the street that was like that scene from “Heat” with Robert De Niro and Al Pacino. Plus added puzzle where you had to work out why you kept getting disconnected. It was UPnP in the end. Disable for co-op but enable for multiplayer.

Kayback · March 1, 2019, 8:30pm

OP_Glitchmobile:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Mmm. I preordered deluxe at a discount for the early access.

I paid $48 for delivery last night, which we finished in seven minutes.

I paid another $20 for a movie that was over in two hours and and sixteen minutes.

Edit: The delivery and movie cost less than deluxe and were completed in two hours and twenty three minutes.

I’m sure you didn’t mean it but your comment could seem a bit insensitive to anyone who struggles with the day-today bills.

For a lot of people Battlefield is an escape from the daily drudgery.

To just wave a wad of cash in their faces and say it’s nothing to you to spend seventy dollars on two hours worth of entertainment seems a little bit disrespectful.

Bear in mind that Battlefield is designed to offer value over a lengthy period of playing time and it’s inherent value or worth is intrinsically linked to that.

Yet these people who struggle to pay their bills found money to buy a console and pay subs fees.

If they struggle to pay bills, why are they playing video games?

Same reason as everyone else who plays video games.

But if they know it is a struggle but still do it, why should anyone ‘feel bad’ for being able to afford it without such struggle?

Now if it was actually to their face and in person perhaps but here?

Naaahhhh.

You think people should stop playing video games because they are poor or struggle to pay the bills?

Is it a good idea to play videogames if you are poor, and struggle to pay the bills?
Or is it a good idea to get a job so you get out of poverty, pay the bills…THEN play videogames?

I know wich one is right.

So poors aren’t allowed any down time? What do you work for H&K or something?

Pelliy · March 1, 2019, 8:53pm

Trokey66:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Mmm. I preordered deluxe at a discount for the early access.

I paid $48 for delivery last night, which we finished in seven minutes.

I paid another $20 for a movie that was over in two hours and and sixteen minutes.

Edit: The delivery and movie cost less than deluxe and were completed in two hours and twenty three minutes.

I’m sure you didn’t mean it but your comment could seem a bit insensitive to anyone who struggles with the day-today bills.

For a lot of people Battlefield is an escape from the daily drudgery.

To just wave a wad of cash in their faces and say it’s nothing to you to spend seventy dollars on two hours worth of entertainment seems a little bit disrespectful.

Bear in mind that Battlefield is designed to offer value over a lengthy period of playing time and it’s inherent value or worth is intrinsically linked to that.

Yet these people who struggle to pay their bills found money to buy a console and pay subs fees.

If they struggle to pay bills, why are they playing video games?

You do realize that video subscriptions are yearly? Also there’s a second hand market? Do you really think they’re buying the latest and greatest?

Frankly I’d be more concerned if a poor person bought a PC with all the latest bells and whistles than a $200 console.

The$200 enjoyment isn’t going to make or break their economic situation but spending$2k-3k likely would.

disposalist · March 1, 2019, 8:54pm

Kayback:

OP_Glitchmobile:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Mmm. I preordered deluxe at a discount for the early access.

I paid $48 for delivery last night, which we finished in seven minutes.

I paid another $20 for a movie that was over in two hours and and sixteen minutes.

Edit: The delivery and movie cost less than deluxe and were completed in two hours and twenty three minutes.

I’m sure you didn’t mean it but your comment could seem a bit insensitive to anyone who struggles with the day-today bills.

For a lot of people Battlefield is an escape from the daily drudgery.

To just wave a wad of cash in their faces and say it’s nothing to you to spend seventy dollars on two hours worth of entertainment seems a little bit disrespectful.

Bear in mind that Battlefield is designed to offer value over a lengthy period of playing time and it’s inherent value or worth is intrinsically linked to that.

Yet these people who struggle to pay their bills found money to buy a console and pay subs fees.

If they struggle to pay bills, why are they playing video games?

Same reason as everyone else who plays video games.

But if they know it is a struggle but still do it, why should anyone ‘feel bad’ for being able to afford it without such struggle?

Now if it was actually to their face and in person perhaps but here?

Naaahhhh.

You think people should stop playing video games because they are poor or struggle to pay the bills?

Is it a good idea to play videogames if you are poor, and struggle to pay the bills?
Or is it a good idea to get a job so you get out of poverty, pay the bills…THEN play videogames?

I know wich one is right.

So poors aren’t allowed any down time? What do you work for H&K or something?

Yeah! Video games and cable TV is a human right!

Why would you chose to buy more healthy food and heat your house when you can get the latest games and TV streams. And training shoes. Those things are basic necessities!

Pelliy · March 1, 2019, 8:55pm

OP_Glitchmobile:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Mmm. I preordered deluxe at a discount for the early access.

I paid $48 for delivery last night, which we finished in seven minutes.

I paid another $20 for a movie that was over in two hours and and sixteen minutes.

Edit: The delivery and movie cost less than deluxe and were completed in two hours and twenty three minutes.

I’m sure you didn’t mean it but your comment could seem a bit insensitive to anyone who struggles with the day-today bills.

For a lot of people Battlefield is an escape from the daily drudgery.

To just wave a wad of cash in their faces and say it’s nothing to you to spend seventy dollars on two hours worth of entertainment seems a little bit disrespectful.

Bear in mind that Battlefield is designed to offer value over a lengthy period of playing time and it’s inherent value or worth is intrinsically linked to that.

Yet these people who struggle to pay their bills found money to buy a console and pay subs fees.

If they struggle to pay bills, why are they playing video games?

Same reason as everyone else who plays video games.

But if they know it is a struggle but still do it, why should anyone ‘feel bad’ for being able to afford it without such struggle?

Now if it was actually to their face and in person perhaps but here?

Naaahhhh.

You think people should stop playing video games because they are poor or struggle to pay the bills?

Is it a good idea to play videogames if you are poor, and struggle to pay the bills?
Or is it a good idea to get a job so you get out of poverty, pay the bills…THEN play videogames?

I know wich one is right.

Why are you assuming they’re not working? They might have worked hella hours just to be able to even afford the console.

KPNuts74 · March 1, 2019, 10:40pm

Pelliy:

OP_Glitchmobile:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

Trokey66:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Mmm. I preordered deluxe at a discount for the early access.

I paid $48 for delivery last night, which we finished in seven minutes.

I paid another $20 for a movie that was over in two hours and and sixteen minutes.

Edit: The delivery and movie cost less than deluxe and were completed in two hours and twenty three minutes.

I’m sure you didn’t mean it but your comment could seem a bit insensitive to anyone who struggles with the day-today bills.

For a lot of people Battlefield is an escape from the daily drudgery.

To just wave a wad of cash in their faces and say it’s nothing to you to spend seventy dollars on two hours worth of entertainment seems a little bit disrespectful.

Bear in mind that Battlefield is designed to offer value over a lengthy period of playing time and it’s inherent value or worth is intrinsically linked to that.

Yet these people who struggle to pay their bills found money to buy a console and pay subs fees.

If they struggle to pay bills, why are they playing video games?

Same reason as everyone else who plays video games.

But if they know it is a struggle but still do it, why should anyone ‘feel bad’ for being able to afford it without such struggle?

Now if it was actually to their face and in person perhaps but here?

Naaahhhh.

You think people should stop playing video games because they are poor or struggle to pay the bills?

Is it a good idea to play videogames if you are poor, and struggle to pay the bills?
Or is it a good idea to get a job so you get out of poverty, pay the bills…THEN play videogames?

I know wich one is right.

Why are you assuming they’re not working? They might have worked hella hours just to be able to even afford the console.

If someone has to work many hours to buy a console maybe they should be spending the money on more important things.

TEKNOCODE · March 3, 2019, 5:55pm

MAJWolfcookies:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Khronikos:

Apex has some of the same issues BFV will face for BR. These games are trying to replace the tween fanbase of Fortnite, but they don’t have a chance in hell of doing it. Apex is addictive, but as of now it’s super imbalanced and quite honestly just an RNG game. It’s basically you collecting useless loot for 3/4 of your time playing it. You don’t keep the loot. You use it for the one maybe two firefights you usually get into with randoms. That is if you didn’t die or quit out after one minute.

With a full squad of good players it can be fun. But I rarely have the time for that, and even when I do it doesn’t always work out. Apex sucks up too much time much like a lot of BR games. Not sure I really care for it to be honest. Not enough action for me.

These BR games only work when you have balanced teams and good squad play. BF does not have balanced teams so we know that won’t be happening. I can’t imagine people are going to stick with Apex unless it majorly improves, but IDK maybe people love this addictive uselessness.

I think it’s good to spot addictive games though. They are bad for you. BF is full of addicts just looking for something, but I doubt V is it. This game just doesn’t seem like it will do all that well in the BR genre. But maybe their map is insanely awesome or something. I just doubt it.

Plus it doesn’t have that teenly flair that Apex has. It seems more of the tweens and teens love this BR stuff. I find it a waste of time for the most part. It can be really fun and addictive, but playing alone it’s completely RNG as to how any given match goes. I just don’t understand why people love this stuff.

Who gets addicted to video games?

More like; people are addicted to things that they don’t like.

Example: continually posts on a forum for a game that the person doesn’t like.

You’re in no place to lecture about addiction when you have over 10,000 forum posts.

You seem obsessed with that. Addiction can be harmful.

It certainly doesn’t seem to have done you any good.

Dude- don’t mind that shill-troll. He and the rest of his “club” either A) don’t play or B) not particularly good and C) thus have no clue -

Aww, I’m flattered.

TEKNOCODE · March 3, 2019, 5:57pm

BaronVonGoon:

TEKNOCODE:

Khronikos:

Apex has some of the same issues BFV will face for BR. These games are trying to replace the tween fanbase of Fortnite, but they don’t have a chance in hell of doing it. Apex is addictive, but as of now it’s super imbalanced and quite honestly just an RNG game. It’s basically you collecting useless loot for 3/4 of your time playing it. You don’t keep the loot. You use it for the one maybe two firefights you usually get into with randoms. That is if you didn’t die or quit out after one minute.

With a full squad of good players it can be fun. But I rarely have the time for that, and even when I do it doesn’t always work out. Apex sucks up too much time much like a lot of BR games. Not sure I really care for it to be honest. Not enough action for me.

These BR games only work when you have balanced teams and good squad play. BF does not have balanced teams so we know that won’t be happening. I can’t imagine people are going to stick with Apex unless it majorly improves, but IDK maybe people love this addictive uselessness.

I think it’s good to spot addictive games though. They are bad for you. BF is full of addicts just looking for something, but I doubt V is it. This game just doesn’t seem like it will do all that well in the BR genre. But maybe their map is insanely awesome or something. I just doubt it.

Plus it doesn’t have that teenly flair that Apex has. It seems more of the tweens and teens love this BR stuff. I find it a waste of time for the most part. It can be really fun and addictive, but playing alone it’s completely RNG as to how any given match goes. I just don’t understand why people love this stuff.

Who gets addicted to video games?

More like; people are addicted to things that they don’t like.

Example: continually posts on a forum for a game that the person doesn’t like.

He said something along the lines of he’s doing it as long as EA continue their practices. He may actually think he’s harming EA in some way. Maybe he thinks he’s the reason for EA’s stock price taking a hit?

Am I allowed to respond to you? Apparently, we are the same person.

Probably so. I’m the sole reason that Amazon’s stock is so high.

I’m ADDICTED to Amazon and Amazon Prime Now.

Trokey66 · March 3, 2019, 6:10pm

TEKNOCODE:

MAJWolfcookies:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

warslag:

TEKNOCODE:

Khronikos:

Apex has some of the same issues BFV will face for BR. These games are trying to replace the tween fanbase of Fortnite, but they don’t have a chance in hell of doing it. Apex is addictive, but as of now it’s super imbalanced and quite honestly just an RNG game. It’s basically you collecting useless loot for 3/4 of your time playing it. You don’t keep the loot. You use it for the one maybe two firefights you usually get into with randoms. That is if you didn’t die or quit out after one minute.

With a full squad of good players it can be fun. But I rarely have the time for that, and even when I do it doesn’t always work out. Apex sucks up too much time much like a lot of BR games. Not sure I really care for it to be honest. Not enough action for me.

These BR games only work when you have balanced teams and good squad play. BF does not have balanced teams so we know that won’t be happening. I can’t imagine people are going to stick with Apex unless it majorly improves, but IDK maybe people love this addictive uselessness.

I think it’s good to spot addictive games though. They are bad for you. BF is full of addicts just looking for something, but I doubt V is it. This game just doesn’t seem like it will do all that well in the BR genre. But maybe their map is insanely awesome or something. I just doubt it.

Plus it doesn’t have that teenly flair that Apex has. It seems more of the tweens and teens love this BR stuff. I find it a waste of time for the most part. It can be really fun and addictive, but playing alone it’s completely RNG as to how any given match goes. I just don’t understand why people love this stuff.

Who gets addicted to video games?

More like; people are addicted to things that they don’t like.

Example: continually posts on a forum for a game that the person doesn’t like.

You’re in no place to lecture about addiction when you have over 10,000 forum posts.

You seem obsessed with that. Addiction can be harmful.

It certainly doesn’t seem to have done you any good.

Dude- don’t mind that shill-troll. He and the rest of his “club” either A) don’t play or B) not particularly good and C) thus have no clue -

Aww, I’m flattered.

Would it be considered ‘trolling’ if I pointed out that he missed out ‘B)’?

If it is, then I won’t.

misisipiRivrRat · March 3, 2019, 6:23pm

TEKNOCODE:

BaronVonGoon:

TEKNOCODE:

Khronikos:

Apex has some of the same issues BFV will face for BR. These games are trying to replace the tween fanbase of Fortnite, but they don’t have a chance in hell of doing it. Apex is addictive, but as of now it’s super imbalanced and quite honestly just an RNG game. It’s basically you collecting useless loot for 3/4 of your time playing it. You don’t keep the loot. You use it for the one maybe two firefights you usually get into with randoms. That is if you didn’t die or quit out after one minute.

With a full squad of good players it can be fun. But I rarely have the time for that, and even when I do it doesn’t always work out. Apex sucks up too much time much like a lot of BR games. Not sure I really care for it to be honest. Not enough action for me.

These BR games only work when you have balanced teams and good squad play. BF does not have balanced teams so we know that won’t be happening. I can’t imagine people are going to stick with Apex unless it majorly improves, but IDK maybe people love this addictive uselessness.

I think it’s good to spot addictive games though. They are bad for you. BF is full of addicts just looking for something, but I doubt V is it. This game just doesn’t seem like it will do all that well in the BR genre. But maybe their map is insanely awesome or something. I just doubt it.

Plus it doesn’t have that teenly flair that Apex has. It seems more of the tweens and teens love this BR stuff. I find it a waste of time for the most part. It can be really fun and addictive, but playing alone it’s completely RNG as to how any given match goes. I just don’t understand why people love this stuff.

Who gets addicted to video games?

More like; people are addicted to things that they don’t like.

Example: continually posts on a forum for a game that the person doesn’t like.

He said something along the lines of he’s doing it as long as EA continue their practices. He may actually think he’s harming EA in some way. Maybe he thinks he’s the reason for EA’s stock price taking a hit?

Am I allowed to respond to you? Apparently, we are the same person.

Probably so. I’m the sole reason that Amazon’s stock is so high.

I’m ADDICTED to Amazon and Amazon Prime Now.

Off topic man , but I see in your signature , connoisseur of bourbon. I’m cultivating my taste for bourbon slowly after much prodding from a friend. Right now I enjoy Buffalo Trace and Four Roses. Can you recommend anything for a newb? Might also mention I’d rather pay in the $25-50 range. Good quality taste without breaking the bank you know?

LOLGotYerTags · March 3, 2019, 6:37pm

Since the thread has massively gone off topic I am now closing it.

At least you all kept it on topic for the majority of 25 pages though so GG.

Pillownaut · March 1, 2019, 11:17pm

I logged in just to check out the coop stuff after the patch. Played for 10 minutes and quit. What’s up with the aimbot artillery? - To keep you from camping? In a PVE gamemode? xD

Genosha-NL · March 2, 2019, 2:12am

Paid full price in the PS store..I even pre-orderd.
Even though I play battlefield since 2142 (that was awsome) I do like BFV as well.
There are things they need to fix and add though..
Disappointed in the stuff we get from having the Deluxe edition..certainly does feel like a rip-off.