# THIS IS HOW IT SHOULD BE and my hope **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [February 15, 2019, 5:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592 "2019-02-15T17:06:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 18\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/ed655f/32.png) [@ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElSamuel04)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 5:06pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/1 "2019-02-15T17:06:00Z")
This is how it should be: (note the language is in Italian because I have the game in Italian, and also i’m not good in photoshop so i apologies but is for give a idea.) ![B09hyt0.jpg](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/d/a/da8a1a5653855c58ad0b060b58156216bd1bc2b7.jpeg) Two factions, allies forces and axis forces (ofc). When selecting the faction of the allies you can select the following countries: **United kingdom, United States, Soviet union and France.** When selecting the axis faction, the following countries can be selected: **Germany, Italy, Japan.** Obviously each nation will have its own uniforms, playable characters, and related vehicles (so if you chose between ITALY or JAPAN layout will change from German). In addition, each nation will have 3 new maps available, no matter the precise historical or invented place, the important thing is to have 3 maps each nation to increase the fun. Let’s see now against the nations clashed and feasibility. SOVIET UNION vs German (2 maps) and japan (1 map) USA vs German (1 map), Italy (1 map) and japan (1map) ITALY vs United kingdom (2 map) and USA (1 map) JAPAN vs Soviet union (1map), Usa (1map), and United kingdom (1map) FRANCE vs German (2map) and Italy (1map) Many maps can be shared of course, but it would be great to have these fights on BF5. I believe that we all want a battlefield 5, in which we can play and have fun on all the main factions of the Second World War, with weapons, vehicles and new challenges. There are many possibilities, even if it were in command of battlefield I would do so and putting dlc and paid content for the new factions. I’ll explain; **Each new faction will have 4 characters, 2 standard uniforms and 3 new maps, all this free for those who own the basic game.** **The paid content will cover the new uniforms, skins for weapons and vehicles of each new country. (So ​​imagine the earning potential)** **Once this is done, I would develop a minor nation as a paid dlc, like China (or others).** This game could have an immense longevity and a constant commercial income for years. _In fact there is currently no fps game on World War II with beautiful graphics and gameplay and (if they do) with so much variety of nations and maps. It would be a lasting game._ **Furthermore, to give emphasis to the creation and publication of new nations, I would particularly like to focus on marketing, a video trailer for each nation created with scenes and music; Moreover, videos in which the developers talk about the creation of maps and vehicles for a nation contextualizing the historical period, with curiosity facts.** **I would post polls in forum about the balancing of weapons / maps and vehicles to ensure continuous feedback on the gameplay improvement (the community feeling appreciated, will continue to play the game, as well as create positive reviews on all social media, keeping the interest of the game active then doing advertising without waste of resources by EA for other marketing).** Thanks for watching. ---
**Author:** ![ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/ed655f/32.png) [@ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElSamuel04)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 5:07pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/2 "2019-02-15T17:07:00Z")
I will take second comment reserved for edit in future, thanks. ---
**Author:** ![Whiteshark9O](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/a87d85/32.png) [@Whiteshark9O](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Whiteshark9O)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 5:37pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/3 "2019-02-15T17:37:00Z")
I really like your idea, I hope dice will read it and if feasible add all the things you mentioned! ---
**Author:** ![Mangrey](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/439d5e/32.png) [@Mangrey](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Mangrey)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 5:47pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/4 "2019-02-15T17:47:00Z")
and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now ---
**Author:** ![ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/ed655f/32.png) [@ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElSamuel04)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 10:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/5 "2019-02-15T22:05:00Z")
> [@Mangrey](#): > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). ---
**Author:** ![PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ebca7d/32.png) [@PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PoppaPappo)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 10:14pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/6 "2019-02-15T22:14:00Z")
> [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. ---
**Author:** ![Stahlmach](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/d9b06d/32.png) [@Stahlmach](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Stahlmach)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 10:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/7 "2019-02-15T22:25:00Z")
> [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). > > Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? > > It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. Ah yeah sure its the critic of the costumers/players which is killing the game and not the lazy, boring shell of a Game itself which BF V is. Some people… ---
**Author:** ![ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/ed655f/32.png) [@ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElSamuel04)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 10:27pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/8 "2019-02-15T22:27:00Z")
> [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). > > Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? > > It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. self-fulfilling prophecy it does not mean anything in this context. **Negativity is not only due to errors (there may be) but to the LACK of comunication to the community.** **If they confirmed at least that new nations are being developed and that all major major powers will be present in the game, we would certainly be happy, and there will not be negativity comment on forum but only hype about it.** ---
**Author:** ![GENERALONGDONG](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/generalongdong/32/102053_2.png) [@GENERALONGDONG](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GENERALONGDONG)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 10:28pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/9 "2019-02-15T22:28:00Z")
I doubt that most things that may have been planned for this game will ever see the light of day due to the sales figures being lower than EA wanted. I’d be surprised if the Americans even made it in despite there being tank and character models for them in SP. ---
**Author:** ![PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ebca7d/32.png) [@PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PoppaPappo)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 10:58pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/10 "2019-02-15T22:58:00Z")
> [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > > > > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). > > > > Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? > > > > It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. > > self-fulfilling prophecy it does not mean anything in this context. > > **Negativity is not only due to errors (there may be) but to the LACK of comunication to the community.** > > **If they confirmed at least that new nations are being developed and that all major major powers will be present in the game, we would certainly be happy, and there will not be negativity comment on forum but only hype about it.** It actually is relevant in this context. Do you have any idea how many people read this forum? Every Internet forum has a lot more lurkers than posters. If I had wandered in here because I was curious about the game and saw all the constant complaining I might not have bought it. I’m certain that there are some people that have avoided it just because they heard or read somewhere that it was a bad game. It’s apparent, now, that Mass Effect: Andromeda is actually not a bad game. At least to people that are objective and can judge a game on its own merits. Yet, the game tanked, in part, because of all the negative people screaming to anyone who would listen that it was the worst game ever and EA ruined their life, took away their pension, and shot their grandmother. Every single day there are multiple new posts saying they hate this or they hate that or all the devs should be fired or Dice murdered their family or whatever. If you think that doesn’t have an impact on sales you’re freaking kidding yourself. ---
**Author:** ![PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ebca7d/32.png) [@PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PoppaPappo)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 11:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/11 "2019-02-15T23:02:00Z")
> [@GENERALONGDONG](#): > > I doubt that most things that may have been planned for this game will ever see the light of day due to the sales figures being lower than EA wanted. I’d be surprised if the Americans even made it in despite there being tank and character models for them in SP. Yes, we already know there was lot done that had to be canned because of the complaints about “historical accuracy.” Dice’s original intention was obviously a “Weird War 2” and it might of actually been cool, but since a vocal contingent flipped out we’ll never know. Dice should have just stuck with their original plans, because they clearly don’t know what they want the game to be now. ---
**Author:** ![Stahlmach](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/d9b06d/32.png) [@Stahlmach](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Stahlmach)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 11:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/12 "2019-02-15T23:11:00Z")
> [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > > > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > > > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > > > > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > > > > > > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). > > > > > > Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? > > > > > > It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. > > > > self-fulfilling prophecy it does not mean anything in this context. > > > > **Negativity is not only due to errors (there may be) but to the LACK of comunication to the community.** > > > > **If they confirmed at least that new nations are being developed and that all major major powers will be present in the game, we would certainly be happy, and there will not be negativity comment on forum but only hype about it.** > > It actually is relevant in this context. Do you have any idea how many people read this forum? Every Internet forum has a lot more lurkers than posters. If I had wandered in here because I was curious about the game and saw all the constant complaining I might not have bought it. I’m certain that there are some people that have avoided it just because they heard or read somewhere that it was a bad game. > > It’s apparent, now, that Mass Effect: Andromeda is actually not a bad game. At least to people that are objective and can judge a game on its own merits. Yet, the game tanked, in part, because of all the negative people screaming to anyone who would listen that it was the worst game ever and EA ruined their life, took away their pension, and shot their grandmother. > > Every single day there are multiple new posts saying they hate this or they hate that or all the devs should be fired or Dice murdered their family or whatever. If you think that doesn’t have an impact on sales you’re freaking kidding yourself. Well maybe because Andromeda was a broken pile of Garbage when it was released ? Not even mentioning the total joke of a Story. Which of course people will compare with the predecessor. None of your companies was reaching any level like your old crew and the first NPC which you engage when you enter the Citadel 2.0 ( remember that its said that they had no contact with any ark for a year ) talks aboung being trans and joining the Initiative because the Alliance was so narrow-minded… Yeah great job Bioware… If you believe negative feedback would effect a otherwise great game, you are out of your mind. Its plain and simple: people complain about BF V because its a bad game. And being a bad Game effected its sale numbers. No other reason. ---
**Author:** ![ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/ed655f/32.png) [@ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElSamuel04)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 11:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/13 "2019-02-15T23:12:00Z")
> [@GENERALONGDONG](#): > > I doubt that most things that may have been planned for this game will ever see the light of day due to the sales figures being lower than EA wanted. I’d be surprised if the Americans even made it in despite there being tank and character models for them in SP. yea. The same my logical reasoning. And here is the paradox, according to me, sensational of EA. They publish a fps on the second world war with two playable nations, few maps and some bugs. That is feel to me thatthe game was more of a beta than a complete game,and then EA complains about sales below expectations! (That is, what did they expect ?? haha! We are in 2019, not even BF1 had only two playable nations at the beginning!) Also guilty of the disastrous launch trailer (which reminds me so much of battle royale and not WW2, and here my friends we can talk a lot about, i have suspicious). Even if they took 6 months more to develop battlefield but creating a main focus varied multiplayer sector, they would certainly have sold more. **That said, I appreciate the work behind the game, and I hope once finished the job of “maintenance” to be able to see a thriving multiplayer, with nations, maps, vehicles and weapons.** ---
**Author:** ![ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/ed655f/32.png) [@ElSamuel04](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ElSamuel04)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 11:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/14 "2019-02-15T23:31:00Z")
> [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > > > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > > > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > > > > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > > > > > > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). > > > > > > Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? > > > > > > It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. > > > > self-fulfilling prophecy it does not mean anything in this context. > > > > **Negativity is not only due to errors (there may be) but to the LACK of comunication to the community.** > > > > **If they confirmed at least that new nations are being developed and that all major major powers will be present in the game, we would certainly be happy, and there will not be negativity comment on forum but only hype about it.** > > It actually is relevant in this context. Do you have any idea how many people read this forum? Every Internet forum has a lot more lurkers than posters. If I had wandered in here because I was curious about the game and saw all the constant complaining I might not have bought it. I’m certain that there are some people that have avoided it just because they heard or read somewhere that it was a bad game. > If you think that doesn’t have an impact on sales you’re freaking kidding yourself. **I DISAGREE. This is because if a game is lacking and does not meet the community, it has every right to talk about it and to criticize (constructively) in the forum.** **If a game is well done then the positive comments will be superior to the negative / critical comments.** If the negative comments are higher in the forum then there must be an interaction between the developers (or at least one that is in place and reporting) and users. It is the duty of the staff to say take care of the negative comments (which are not a bad thing, if they are constructive and shared by the players) and take note, also trying to communicate with users, who though they wrote the comments and they will feel appreciated. “The game is not perfect but we are working and we are listening to you”. **Negative comments can affect sales? possible .. that’s how it works, as for the positive comments.** **But you can not say “do not criticize the game otherwise it does not sell” and impose mutism.** \*According to your comment then it is as if I went to the restaurant but I could not write a negative review on a dish that I did not like, because otherwise people no longer go to your favorite restaurant and that is likely to close. What is the reasoning? \* it is precisely from the constructive criticism that you can improve. If you do nothing, nothing will improve. ---
**Author:** ![PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/ebca7d/32.png) [@PoppaPappo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/PoppaPappo)\ **Post date:** [February 15, 2019, 11:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/15 "2019-02-15T23:35:00Z")
> [@Stahlmach](#): > > > [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > > > [@PoppaPappo](#): > > > > > > > > > [@ElSamuel04](#): > > > > > > > > > > > [@Mangrey](#): > > > > > > > > > > > > and what make you think that it wont happen ? Dice follows a time line when it comes to maps and we are in 1940 now > > > > > > > > > > I hope it happen man, really but i’m not sure and even many users have doubts about it (read some comments in the forum for example). > > > > > > > > Do you know what a “self-fulfilling prophecy” is and how it works? > > > > > > > > It’s clear that Dice has definitely may some errors and mistakes, but at this point the constant negativity is killing the game as quickly as anything else. > > > > > > self-fulfilling prophecy it does not mean anything in this context. > > > > > > **Negativity is not only due to errors (there may be) but to the LACK of comunication to the community.** > > > > > > **If they confirmed at least that new nations are being developed and that all major major powers will be present in the game, we would certainly be happy, and there will not be negativity comment on forum but only hype about it.** > > > > It actually is relevant in this context. Do you have any idea how many people read this forum? Every Internet forum has a lot more lurkers than posters. If I had wandered in here because I was curious about the game and saw all the constant complaining I might not have bought it. I’m certain that there are some people that have avoided it just because they heard or read somewhere that it was a bad game. > > > > It’s apparent, now, that Mass Effect: Andromeda is actually not a bad game. At least to people that are objective and can judge a game on its own merits. Yet, the game tanked, in part, because of all the negative people screaming to anyone who would listen that it was the worst game ever and EA ruined their life, took away their pension, and shot their grandmother. > > > > Every single day there are multiple new posts saying they hate this or they hate that or all the devs should be fired or Dice murdered their family or whatever. If you think that doesn’t have an impact on sales you’re freaking kidding yourself. > > Well maybe because Andromeda was a broken pile of Garbage when it was released ? Not even mentioning the total joke of a Story. Which of course people will compare with the predecessor. > None of your companies was reaching any level like your old crew and the first NPC which you engage when you enter the Citadel 2.0 ( remember that its said that they had no contact with any ark for a year ) talks aboung being trans and joining the Initiative because the Alliance was so narrow-minded… > Yeah great job Bioware… > > If you believe negative feedback would effect a otherwise great game, you are out of your mind. > Its plain and simple: people complain about BF V because its a bad game. And being a bad Game effected its sale numbers. No other reason. It’s actually not a bad game. It’s just not what you want it to be. You need to accept that and move on. Believe me, I understand. I was furious with the Star Wars prequels. They lacked everything that made the originals great and actually undermined the essential principles of the originals (Luke was an everyman on the Hero’s Journey, then the prequels suddenly make it about sacred bloodlines). But, eventually I learned to just move on with my life. The about of constant hatred and vitriol is astounding. Honestly, if you hate this game so much, why are you here? Seriously. Why are you here? I don’t know if you’re one of the people that wants it to be BF4 or BF1 or BF1942 or what, but it’s not that. That was my point about Mass Effect. They made the point that they were going to a new galaxy and starting fresh, from scratch. But, because it wasn’t exactly just like 1-3 people flipped out. However, everyone I know that was capable of being objective and judged the game on its own merits has enjoyed it. ---
**Author:** ![DCSTomcat](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dcstomcat/32/101664_2.png) [@DCSTomcat](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DCSTomcat)\ **Post date:** [February 16, 2019, 2:58am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/16 "2019-02-16T02:58:00Z")
Why only four allies? The Big Five or permanent members of the United Nations Security Council should all be there. ---
**Author:** ![Humpday15](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/e19adc/32.png) [@Humpday15](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Humpday15)\ **Post date:** [February 16, 2019, 4:51am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/17 "2019-02-16T04:51:00Z")
> [@DCSTomcat](#): > > Why only four allies? The Big Five or permanent members of the United Nations Security Council should all be there. Highly doubtful that they would add a Chinese faction or any Chinese weapons or equipment. ---
**Author:** ![DCSTomcat](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dcstomcat/32/101664_2.png) [@DCSTomcat](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DCSTomcat)\ **Post date:** [February 16, 2019, 6:37am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-is-how-it-should-be-and-my-hope/106592/18 "2019-02-16T06:37:00Z")
> [@Humpday15](#): > > > [@DCSTomcat](#): > > > > Why only four allies? The Big Five or permanent members of the United Nations Security Council should all be there. > > Highly doubtful that they would add a Chinese faction or any Chinese weapons or equipment. They use US and German equipment, so no need to add those. ![helme-1024x692.jpg](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/e/9/e91ca049f663a5074e11500e188c4b8d6c84dc2a.jpeg)