# This map looks awesome.

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [November 1, 2018, 7:47am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847 "2018-11-01T07:47:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ProAssassin2003](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/proassassin2003/32/103170_2.png) [@ProAssassin2003](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ProAssassin2003)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 7:47am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/1 "2018-11-01T07:47:00Z")

</div>

[https://mp1st.com/news/battlefield-5-aerodrome-map-sneak-peek](https://mp1st.com/news/battlefield-5-aerodrome-map-sneak-peek)

Although I see a problem with one side having 3 flags really close to spawn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadlyDanDaMan](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/e5b9ba/32.png) [@DeadlyDanDaMan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DeadlyDanDaMan)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 7:49am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/2 "2018-11-01T07:49:00Z")

</div>

> [@ProAssassin2003](#):
>
> [https://mp1st.com/news/battlefield-5-aerodrome-map-sneak-peek](https://mp1st.com/news/battlefield-5-aerodrome-map-sneak-peek)
> 
> Although I see a problem with one side having 3 flags really close to spawn.

Meh, we’ll see how much of a problem it actually is once we get to play it. You can’t make a final determination on just an aerial picture layout. Excited to get more info and pictures of ALL the maps 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/eb8c5e/32.png) [@ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ninjapenquinuk)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 8:50am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/3 "2018-11-01T08:50:00Z")

</div>

> [@ProAssassin2003](#):
>
> [https://mp1st.com/news/battlefield-5-aerodrome-map-sneak-peek](https://mp1st.com/news/battlefield-5-aerodrome-map-sneak-peek)
> 
> Although I see a problem with one side having 3 flags really close to spawn.

If the British have lots of transport (I’m guessing the map is based on LRDG/SAS raids) they could easily cap their ‘gimme’ flags at the same time as the German side if they are mostly on foot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VincentNZ](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/ce7236/32.png) [@VincentNZ](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/VincentNZ)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 9:58am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/4 "2018-11-01T09:58:00Z")

</div>

Looks to open for my taste from the overview. As for the flag distribution, it might be asymmetrically balanced to make up for that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JediMastaWyn](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/jedimastawyn/32/102384_2.png) [@JediMastaWyn](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/JediMastaWyn)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 12:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/5 "2018-11-01T12:03:00Z")

</div>

Sigh, getting a bit bored of central focal points on a lot of these maps now. It just ends up with everyone zerging the middle with outer flags being an after thought. It will just end up with everyone fighting over the hanger and few sporadic battles over rest. A and F won’t get a look in. It’s like they’re saying look here at C is where all the action is instead of the maps having a natural flow.

I want to Levolution that hanger 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/eb8c5e/32.png) [@ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ninjapenquinuk)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 1:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/6 "2018-11-01T13:02:00Z")

</div>

> [@JediMastaWyn](#):
>
> Sigh, getting a bit bored of central focal points on a lot of these maps now. It just ends up with everyone zerging the middle with outer flags being an after thought. It will just end up with everyone fighting over the hanger and few sporadic battles over rest. A and F won’t get a look in. It’s like they’re saying look here at C is where all the action is instead of the maps having a natural flow.
> 
> I want to Levolution that hanger 😃

Better than the flag cap merry go rounds that happen on a lot of maps. Much prefer more intense fight over a couple flags,with flanking possibilities for back caps, than maps like Nivelle Nights

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriendlyFyre\_tv](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/13edae/32.png) [@FriendlyFyre\_tv](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/FriendlyFyre_tv)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 1:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/7 "2018-11-01T13:12:00Z")

</div>

DICE has a horrible track record when creating linear maps (looking at you Suez), I really do not like how some of these flags appear to be “gimme flags.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/noodlesocks/32/101045_2.png) [@Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Noodlesocks)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 1:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/8 "2018-11-01T13:49:00Z")

</div>

That is one tiny map. Just that one screenshot you can see how close the C,D and E flags are to each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/eb8c5e/32.png) [@ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ninjapenquinuk)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 2:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/9 "2018-11-01T14:20:00Z")

</div>

> [@Noodlesocks](#):
>
> That is one tiny map. Just that one screenshot you can see how close the C,D and E flags are to each other.

Good. We could see some epic battles and not just flag hoping.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/noodlesocks/32/101045_2.png) [@Noodlesocks](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Noodlesocks)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 2:38pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/10 "2018-11-01T14:38:00Z")

</div>

> [@ninjapenquinuk](#):
>
> > [@Noodlesocks](#):
> >
> > That is one tiny map. Just that one screenshot you can see how close the C,D and E flags are to each other.
> 
> Good. We could see some epic battles and not just flag hoping.

I suspect it will be the opposite, especially with F providing a lateral approach and the potential for a tank to just sit on the hill and cover all 3 flags.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/eb8c5e/32.png) [@ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ninjapenquinuk)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 2:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/this-map-looks-awesome/105847/11 "2018-11-01T14:53:00Z")

</div>

> [@Noodlesocks](#):
>
> > [@ninjapenquinuk](#):
> >
> > > [@Noodlesocks](#):
> > >
> > > That is one tiny map. Just that one screenshot you can see how close the C,D and E flags are to each other.
> > 
> > Good. We could see some epic battles and not just flag hoping.
> 
> I suspect it will be the opposite, especially with F providing a lateral approach and the potential for a tank to just sit on the hill and cover all 3 flags.

Thats not the ring around the roses flag hopping we see on many maps though. F and A look like they could provide good flanking opportunities
