# Turretless tank destroyers are a terrible addition to BFV - change my mind

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/turretless-tank-destroyers-are-a-terrible-addition-to-bfv-change-my-mind/106394>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [January 17, 2019, 7:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/turretless-tank-destroyers-are-a-terrible-addition-to-bfv-change-my-mind/106394 "2019-01-17T19:41:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WinterWarhurst](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/winterwarhurst/32/107315_2.png) [@WinterWarhurst](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/WinterWarhurst)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2019, 4:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/turretless-tank-destroyers-are-a-terrible-addition-to-bfv-change-my-mind/106394/21 "2019-01-18T16:31:00Z")

</div>

> [@ragnarok013](#):
>
> Tank destroyers are meant to destroy armor so my guess is using turretless variants like the STUG is a balacing decision. I think using a turreted one like the M-10 would make it too good at everything in the balance department.

I suppose this is part of my concern, with so many already complaining about the state of tanks such as the Tiger underperforming, adding 17-pounders to the game which will most likely have incredible effective range, and AT damage output, and camp hull down around spawn, will just make the situation even worse in terms of tank vs tank balance, and engagement enjoyment (or lack of!).

I am not entirely against tank destroyers however, when the Americans arrive, I will be begging for the M18 Hellcat, I don’t care if it’s a glass cannon, it will be so speedy and fun! I’m more concerned about turret less spawn dwelling snipers.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/turretless-tank-destroyers-are-a-terrible-addition-to-bfv-change-my-mind/106394.md?page=1)