# Very curious about the ships in Naval Strike for B1.

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949>\
**Category:** Console\
**Created:** [May 15, 2016, 5:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949 "2016-05-15T17:15:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2016, 5:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/1 "2016-05-15T17:15:00Z")

</div>

Submarines?What type of ships? Battleships, cruisers, destroyers, PT?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2016, 6:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/2 "2016-05-15T18:25:00Z")

</div>

Online it showed a WW1 battleship. Awesome! HMS Iron Duke. And they probably will have US and German battleships. Probably can fire artillery barrages to support your troops and antiaircraft fire from these battleships. Absolutely awesome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thejamman123](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thejamman123/32/103786_2.png) [@thejamman123](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/thejamman123)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 9:08pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/3 "2016-05-19T21:08:00Z")

</div>

I cant wait for the kamikaze battleship with c4 on the front

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mmarkweii/32/102833_2.png) [@mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mmarkweII)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2016, 10:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/4 "2016-05-19T22:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@keith4436](#):
>
> Submarines?What type of ships? Battleships, cruisers, destroyers, PT?

Wait for E3

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ktreis90](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71e660/32.png) [@ktreis90](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ktreis90)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 4:13am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/5 "2016-05-24T04:13:00Z")

</div>

I wonder if they will feature the U.S battleship BB Texas. ive personally been on that ship many times, so much history. XD the ship served in both world wars

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 4:56am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/6 "2016-05-24T04:56:00Z")

</div>

> [@ktreis90](#):
>
> I wonder if they will feature the U.S battleship BB Texas. ive personally been on that ship many times, so much history. XD the ship served in both world wars

I’m not sure but was it the USS IOWA that was used in WW2, Korea and Vietnam.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mmarkweii/32/102833_2.png) [@mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mmarkweII)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 11:46am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/7 "2016-05-24T11:46:00Z")

</div>

I didn’t realize that bf1 has a dlc called naval strike. Thought naval strike was in bf4.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChannonJ](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ed655f/32.png) [@ChannonJ](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ChannonJ)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 12:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/8 "2016-05-24T12:43:00Z")

</div>

> [@mmarkweII](#):
>
> I didn’t realize that bf1 has a dlc called naval strike. Thought naval strike was in bf4.

imagine they’d have air superiority (my favourite thing in BF1942), and maybe even a final stand type, with ‘future’ weapons from WW2.

No idea how BF1 is going to turn out. Not really interested at this point, though. Just have to wait and see. If I know one thing, it’s that it will probably nothing like I expect it to be - good or bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mmarkweii/32/102833_2.png) [@mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mmarkweII)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 3:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/9 "2016-05-24T15:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@ChannonJ](#):
>
> > [@mmarkweII](#):
> >
> > I didn’t realize that bf1 has a dlc called naval strike. Thought naval strike was in bf4.
> 
> imagine they’d have air superiority (my favourite thing in BF1942), and maybe even a final stand type, with ‘future’ weapons from WW2.
> 
> No idea how BF1 is going to turn out. Not really interested at this point, though. Just have to wait and see. If I know one thing, it’s that it will probably nothing like I expect it to be - good or bad.

I’m hoping a lot of questions will be answered in a couple weeks at the EA Play events.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VBALL\_MVP](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/vball_mvp/32/103977_2.png) [@VBALL\_MVP](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/VBALL_MVP)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 4:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/10 "2016-05-24T16:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@thejamman123](#):
>
> I cant wait for the kamikaze battleship with c4 on the front

Kamikaze was WW2…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anthony1181993](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/8797f3/32.png) [@anthony1181993](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/anthony1181993)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 5:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/11 "2016-05-24T17:50:00Z")

</div>

> [@ktreis90](#):
>
> I wonder if they will feature the U.S battleship BB Texas. ive personally been on that ship many times, so much history. XD the ship served in both world wars

> [@keith4436](#):
>
> > [@ktreis90](#):
> >
> > I wonder if they will feature the U.S battleship BB Texas. ive personally been on that ship many times, so much history. XD the ship served in both world wars
> 
> I’m not sure but was it the USS IOWA that was used in WW2, Korea and Vietnam.

The USS Iowa wasn’t built until the 40s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2016, 5:56pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/12 "2016-05-24T17:56:00Z")

</div>

Like I said WW2, Korea, Vietnam. WW2 was 1941-1945. Korea the 1950s. Vietnam 1964-1975. I was there 1972.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LordW00T](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/85e7bf/32.png) [@LordW00T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/LordW00T)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 1:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/13 "2016-05-25T13:21:00Z")

</div>

They can use any kind of ship except the Aircraft Carriers, Germany had a supmarine (can’t find it it’s supmerged), tere were Torpedo boats as counter to the battleships. The battleships itself and then the dreadnought and pre-dreadnought classes.

But I don’t think we’re going to take control of the ships except the guns

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 2:18pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/14 "2016-05-25T14:18:00Z")

</div>

Well as far as I’m concerned I wont be on any ships if I cant control them. Too predictable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LordW00T](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/85e7bf/32.png) [@LordW00T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/LordW00T)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 2:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/15 "2016-05-25T14:25:00Z")

</div>

Sure, but 2 ships in a battle against each other would be awesome

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rene\_16h](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/rene_16h/32/103257_2.png) [@Rene\_16h](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rene_16h)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 11:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/16 "2016-05-25T23:13:00Z")

</div>

> [@keith4436](#):
>
> WW2 was 1941-1945.

WW2 was 1939-1945.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 11:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/17 "2016-05-25T23:22:00Z")

</div>

.

> [@Rene\_16h](#):
>
> > [@keith4436](#):
> >
> > WW2 was 1941-1945.
> 
> WW2 was 1939-1945.

Sorry, WW@ for the US was 1941-1945.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mmarkweii/32/102833_2.png) [@mmarkweII](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/mmarkweII)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 11:36pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/18 "2016-05-25T23:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@keith4436](#):
>
> Like I said WW2, Korea, Vietnam. WW2 was 1941-1945. Korea the 1950s. Vietnam 1964-1975. I was there 1972.

What exactly was your role during the Vietnam war?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Explicits\_Sister](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/explicits_sister/32/101899_2.png) [@Explicits\_Sister](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Explicits_Sister)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2016, 12:25am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/19 "2016-05-26T00:25:00Z")

</div>

What a wonderful thread topic !! Keep up the good work .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/71c47a/32.png) [@keith4436](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/keith4436)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2016, 12:36am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/very-curious-about-the-ships-in-naval-strike-for-b1/103949/20 "2016-05-26T00:36:00Z")

</div>

> [@Explicits\_Sister](#):
>
> What a wonderful thread topic !! Keep up the good work .

Thank you and mark I built weapons that were dropped on the Ho Chi Minh trail which was the main supply trail from North Vietnam. Hey Sister I really appreciate your wonderful support.
