# War.hawk ranking system **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [May 22, 2016, 11:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483 "2016-05-22T23:35:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/7993a0/32.png) [@Rev0verDrive](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Rev0verDrive)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2016, 8:39pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/21 "2016-05-23T20:39:00Z")
> [@smys123](#): > > Perhaps an simpler solution would be to let your class carry the rank, instead of your soldier as a whole…Each class you play can have a rank - 140 medic, 100 recon, 84 support, 12 engineer → drop the lowest and take the top 3 avg = 108 rank > > Prob not the best solution, but an idea. Plus if you like to play one class only maybe you could display that as your soldier - display medic class, so we all see rank 140 > > just some ideas, down on this digital paper > > EDIT: Or keep the 140 rank for each class idea, and when you achieve that you become a general - each rank of 140 is a star, so if you reach rank in the classes + commander you will be a 5 star general. Per class ranking sounds nice. Just because you’re rank 140 in BF4 doesn’t mean you know every class equally. ---
**Author:** ![Maxyb456](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@Maxyb456](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Maxyb456)\ **Post date:** [May 23, 2016, 8:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/22 "2016-05-23T20:41:00Z")
Pretty sure there isnt going to be a ranking system in this game??? Theyve talked about that, unless im wrong ---
**Author:** ![GORILA730](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/5e9695/32.png) [@GORILA730](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GORILA730)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 12:22am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/23 "2016-05-25T00:22:00Z")
You weak that’s why you don’t care about rank ---
**Author:** ![GORILA730](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/5e9695/32.png) [@GORILA730](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GORILA730)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 12:32am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/24 "2016-05-25T00:32:00Z")
Sir xer you have no idea what you talking about ---
**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\ **Post date:** [May 25, 2016, 1:07am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/25 "2016-05-25T01:07:00Z")
> [@GORILA730](#): > > Sir xer you have no idea what you talking about In regards to what, exactly? ---
**Author:** ![GORILA730](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/5e9695/32.png) [@GORILA730](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GORILA730)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 1:54am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/26 "2016-05-30T01:54:00Z")
Everything ---
**Author:** ![Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/sir-xer21/32/103487_2.png) [@Sir-xer21](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Sir-xer21)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2016, 2:59am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483/27 "2016-05-30T02:59:00Z")
> [@GORILA730](#): > > Everything you gonna explain or just leave nebulous criticisms out there without ever qualifying your own opinion because you’re too afraid to get into a debate with me? [Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/war-hawk-ranking-system/101483.md?page=1)