# Well, this is interesting.... **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [February 13, 2019, 3:05am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049 "2019-02-13T03:05:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![M\_Rat13](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/c0e974/32.png) [@M\_Rat13](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/M_Rat13)\ **Post date:** [February 13, 2019, 3:05am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/1 "2019-02-13T03:05:00Z")
Just got a thread locked that was about the ridiculousness of the short 75 mm on the Stug IV, given its role as a tank destroyer (and the fact it just looks dumb), becuase I said whoever did this fopar was was the I word (not risking actually saying it again). Now, while I could of been less inflammatory about the whole thing, it is interesting to note that I wasn’t aiming my thread at anyone in particular, I was just annoyed so little thought had gone into the design of the Stug IV, in that no one had seemed to consider the vehicles role or how silly such a small gun on a TD looked. What I’m guess I’m trying to say is, what I learned today was, sometimes, when you shoot your mouth off into the wind, the wind can bite back. Think before you post. ---
**Author:** ![aRrAyStArTaT0](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/53a042/32.png) [@aRrAyStArTaT0](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/aRrAyStArTaT0)\ **Post date:** [February 13, 2019, 3:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/2 "2019-02-13T03:33:00Z")
Why are you making this thread? . It’s kinda a weird thing to discuss. “I just got a thread locked and here’s how” is all I’m seeing. ---
**Author:** ![full951](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/full951/32/102018_2.png) [@full951](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/full951)\ **Post date:** [February 13, 2019, 4:23am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/3 "2019-02-13T04:23:00Z")
I love Bullet Bill. ---
**Author:** ![DALLAS-ak-PEIPER](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/dallas-ak-peiper/32/101613_2.png) [@DALLAS-ak-PEIPER](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DALLAS-ak-PEIPER)\ **Post date:** [February 13, 2019, 7:49am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/4 "2019-02-13T07:49:00Z")
> [@Sprinkles298](#): > > Why are you making this thread? > . > It’s kinda a weird thing to discuss. “I just got a thread locked and here’s how” is all I’m seeing. I think he says that these chat rules are garbage… I hope i will not get jailed again for “garbage” ---
**Author:** ![M\_Rat13](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/c0e974/32.png) [@M\_Rat13](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/M_Rat13)\ **Post date:** [February 13, 2019, 7:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/5 "2019-02-13T19:25:00Z")
> [@DALLAS-ak-PEIPER](#): > > > [@Sprinkles298](#): > > > > Why are you making this thread? > > . > > It’s kinda a weird thing to discuss. “I just got a thread locked and here’s how” is all I’m seeing. > > I think he says that these chat rules are garbage… I hope i will not get jailed again for “garbage” More I’m showing how little it takes to get banned, so be careful. ---
**Author:** ![aRrAyStArTaT0](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/53a042/32.png) [@aRrAyStArTaT0](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/aRrAyStArTaT0)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2019, 7:22pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/6 "2019-02-14T19:22:00Z")
> [@M\_Rat13](#): > > > [@DALLAS-ak-PEIPER](#): > > > > > [@Sprinkles298](#): > > > > > > Why are you making this thread? > > > . > > > It’s kinda a weird thing to discuss. “I just got a thread locked and here’s how” is all I’m seeing. > > > > I think he says that these chat rules are garbage… I hope i will not get jailed again for “garbage” > > More I’m showing how little it takes to get banned, so be careful. Honestly, if you’re getting banned, it’s probably for good reason. Discussion on moderation is already bad. ---
**Author:** ![LOLGotYerTags](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/lolgotyertags/32/101041_2.png) [@LOLGotYerTags](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/LOLGotYerTags)\ **Post date:** [February 14, 2019, 7:37pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/well-this-is-interesting/254049/7 "2019-02-14T19:37:00Z")
> [@M\_Rat13](#): > > More I’m showing how little it takes to get banned, so be careful. You do know discussing moderation is also a violation of the rules, right? I mean, You did actually _read_ the rules.. Didn’t you? Regarding the lock of your prior thread, If you refer to others as “idiots”, whether it is aimed at any specific person or not, It is unwelcome and nonconstructive, It can also be seen to be forum disruption and abuse if it were to be viewed that way. It also goes against the forum guidelines in that we want the Battlefield forum to be a welcoming and inviting space for all whom wish to participate in discussions. To expand a little further on this.. Here is a quote directly from the forum rules opening post. > [@](#): > > We want the forums to be the best place to visit and discuss all things Battlefield. Anyone should be comfortable making a post, sharing their thoughts and ideas as well as interacting with other players. > > **People get the best out of forums when everyone is treated with respect and courtesy. We ask everyone to interact in a civilized manner.** So calling others ( be it Dev, EA staff, Moderators or other Users ) “idiots” is not treating others with respect and courtesy. So please do not replicate this thread as the ability to create new threads will be revoked temporarily via a second level infraction. Thank you.