# What would you have titled BF1?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 9, 2016, 3:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759 "2016-06-09T15:15:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/1 "2016-06-09T15:15:00Z")

</div>

There was some surprise when DICE/EA announced that the next BF game to follow BF4 would be titled “BF1”.  
If you were responsible for naming BF games, what would you have titled BF1?  
I think I would have continued the numbering and titled the game “BF5”, simply for the sake of consistency and continuity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HighbornDeathMan](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/d07c76/32.png) [@HighbornDeathMan](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/HighbornDeathMan)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:17pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/2 "2016-06-09T15:17:00Z")

</div>

Battlefield: 1914

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/3 "2016-06-09T15:20:00Z")

</div>

BF1 is fine. It’s not like anyone previously called the first BF game,1942, BF1 so I think it fits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robkrush](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a9adbd/32.png) [@robkrush](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/robkrush)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:23pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/4 "2016-06-09T15:23:00Z")

</div>

Battlefield 5. Duh! What were they thinking? Good luck with figuring out what their next title will be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/5 "2016-06-09T15:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@robkrush](#):
>
> Battlefield 5. Duh! What were they thinking? Good luck with figuring out what their next title will be.

Ahhhhh it could be BF5… lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![robkrush](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/a9adbd/32.png) [@robkrush](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/robkrush)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/6 "2016-06-09T15:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@B3ANTOWN\_\_B3A5T](#):
>
> > [@robkrush](#):
> >
> > Battlefield 5. Duh! What were they thinking? Good luck with figuring out what their next title will be.
> 
> Ahhhhh it could be BF5… lol

They could make Battlefield Bad Company 3 and title it “Battlefield Bad Company 1” because, technically, that hasn’t been used yet. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/7 "2016-06-09T15:31:00Z")

</div>

> [@robkrush](#):
>
> > [@B3ANTOWN\_\_B3A5T](#):
> >
> > > [@robkrush](#):
> > >
> > > Battlefield 5. Duh! What were they thinking? Good luck with figuring out what their next title will be.
> > 
> > Ahhhhh it could be BF5… lol
> 
> They could make Battlefield Bad Company 3 and title it “Battlefield Bad Company 1” because, technically, that hasn’t been used yet. 😃

But that would get confusing. No one in the history of planet earth has referred to BF1942 as BF1

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 3:34pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/8 "2016-06-09T15:34:00Z")

</div>

No, calling the BF game that comes after BF4 “BF1” is confusing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DARTH\_JAR\_JAR222](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/darth_jar_jar222/32/101644_2.png) [@DARTH\_JAR\_JAR222](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DARTH_JAR_JAR222)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:11pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/9 "2016-06-09T16:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> No, calling the BF game that comes after BF4 “BF1” is confusing.

Confusing? That’s a bit of a stretch, isn’t it? I know you can read and write, so I’m assuming you said that for affect. Or, you’re projecting what some dullard can’t figure out. Either way…c’mon man

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/10 "2016-06-09T16:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> No, calling the BF game that comes after BF4 “BF1” is confusing.

Not when it’s attached to WW1 because they flow together. If it was another Vietnam BF and they called it BF1 I’d agree. However when 1 is in the name of the war the game is based on I think BF1 fits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/11 "2016-06-09T16:13:00Z")

</div>

@DARTH_JAR_JAR222  
_effect_  
Writing 101

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VenomRTX](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/venomrtx/32/103986_2.png) [@VenomRTX](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/VenomRTX)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:14pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/12 "2016-06-09T16:14:00Z")

</div>

Battlefield Genesis. The premium version would be called Battlefield Genesis: Phil Collins Edition 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:15pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/13 "2016-06-09T16:15:00Z")

</div>

> [@B3ANTOWN\_\_B3A5T](#):
>
> > [@Lordmang4](#):
> >
> > No, calling the BF game that comes after BF4 “BF1” is confusing.
> 
> Not when it’s attached to WW1 because they flow together. If it was another Vietnam BF and they called it BF1 I’d agree. However when 1 is in the name of the war the game is based on I think BF1 fits.

Yes, because BF3 is based on World War 3 and BF4 is based on WW4. /sarcasm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/278dde/32.png) [@Vespervin1](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Vespervin1)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:16pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/14 "2016-06-09T16:16:00Z")

</div>

I would’ve called it ‘Battlefield’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/15 "2016-06-09T16:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> > [@B3ANTOWN\_\_B3A5T](#):
> >
> > > [@Lordmang4](#):
> > >
> > > No, calling the BF game that comes after BF4 “BF1” is confusing.
> > 
> > Not when it’s attached to WW1 because they flow together. If it was another Vietnam BF and they called it BF1 I’d agree. However when 1 is in the name of the war the game is based on I think BF1 fits.
> 
> Yes, because BF3 is based on World War 3 and BF4 is based on WW4. /sarcasm

You cereal m8… they’re direct sequels based on modern wars after BF2. It makes perfect sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/16 "2016-06-09T16:20:00Z")

</div>

So based on that astute logic, the next BF game after BF4 (regardless of time period) should be… BF5.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/17 "2016-06-09T16:25:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> So based on that astute logic, the next BF game after BF4 should be… BF5.

If it’s set in modern times… yes.

If it’s a sillier spin off then make it BC3

If its future 2143

If its another WW2 BF 1944

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/e19b73/32.png) [@Lordmang4](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lordmang4)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:29pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/18 "2016-06-09T16:29:00Z")

</div>

And yet BF2 was World War 2 so…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smys123](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/5f8ce5/32.png) [@smys123](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/smys123)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:30pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/19 "2016-06-09T16:30:00Z")

</div>

Battlefield: The Great War

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/b3antown_b3a5t/32/101262_2.png) [@B3ANTOWN\_B3A5T](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/B3ANTOWN_B3A5T)\
**Post date:** [June 9, 2016, 4:35pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759/20 "2016-06-09T16:35:00Z")

</div>

> [@Lordmang4](#):
>
> And yet BF2 was World War 2 so…

It certainly wasn’t. I never even played it and know that. Google is your friend homie

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/what-would-you-have-titled-bf1/101759.md?page=2)
