No. It is our gamble.
We bought the game. We play the game. The vast majority like it as is. Why give something we dont and didn’t ask for a chance?
No. It is our gamble.
We bought the game. We play the game. The vast majority like it as is. Why give something we dont and didn’t ask for a chance?
Nearly there, last nail in the coffin, last roll of the DICE! You think the original change of TTK was bad wait until this one hits, it’s not going to be pretty
There is no plan, there hasn’t been a clear plan or outline from the get go.
Since it’s a ww2 game, maybe a lesson could be learned from this. I recall a large European population gave a certain socialist party in Germany “ a chance”. How did that work out for them?
Idk why people hate it so much, Battlefield 1 was far more entertaining and had more success than the actual crap. The problem is that the ones who hate it are the typical dumbasses that only play to get killstreaks instead of doing what they’re supposed to.
This is dumb.
I hate it and have like 0.7 KD.
Using BF1 as yardstick is also dumb. 1.) It was more successful because it had better marketing, better maps, and launched in a better state. 2.) The 2 games were marketed as different things. 3.) Where do you think that marketing came from? Yep, from complaints from nerf gun cdntral called BF1.
You can’t market a game to be one thing and then change it something else. That is why people hate it.
Not to mention the bandage, instant self heal that will lead to an extra bullet or two to kill someone.
The ttk in bf1 is much faster than it will be in this.
I honestly haven’t noticed the ttk any faster in bf5 than it was in bf1.
3 shot rifles are still 3 shot. I’m effective with them regardless of who I go against.
I have never been killed past 40m with a Tommy gun.
Sniper rifles are not nearly as good, Honestly, I don’t know any classes of guns that are actually better than in bf1 other than possibly LMG’s.