^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think the server control, is the main issue with this game. That’s why it’s going to die, unless they give more control to the person renting the server.
Maybe they want the game to feel unfinished or unbalanced for a reason? Maybe so we buy their DLC’s and expansions to provide balance and progression?
Maybe its just because they want to thunk out a new waterbrained battlefield bastardchild every year from now on.
Certainly a good business practice. Always leaving your audience wanting more, of which there are many ways to do so, one would be to produce inferior products to keep people buying hoping for more allied with powerful marketing making this a very viable option at present.
why lock region would help ?? issue is with cheaters, not enough cover when running cause too many sniper campers all the way can hit you across of the map…
Yes, my feeling exactly. They took all the good stuff from BF4, threw it away, then they took all the bad crap, made it look good , wrapped it in WW1 and tadaaaaah. BF1
Hitreg is worst then it ever was in BF4.
Except the west coast is really weak it seems to me. I have to play eastern servers most of the time… NOT to mention to have a decent game against ping exploiters I need to have my ping at around 100. Crazy people be writing this code.
I quit because of the huge amount of cheaters and that nothing is being done with it and that the game feels like a reskinned battlefront.
I’m done with the bf series and EA.
Ive been asking for that frak1ng YEARS
I am sick and tired of WANKERS with HIGH ping from EU/UK/Poland/RU/USA/Middle East/etc
ruining OUR servers in OUR country
Au to NZ - Under 100 ping
AU to JP - 135-155 ping
AU to China - Over 200 ping
AU to India - Over 200 ping
AU to USA - 225-285 ping
AU to EU - 325-385 ping
AU to Ru - 355-405 ping
Its using the console watered down SWBF3 PC game rebagged into “battlefield” with server browser tac’ed on as an after thought and you can see the LACK of PC optmisation in this release
It really does not matter if people are quitting the PC version of the game, I suspect that it has sold tons on the console and at the end of the day its console money that matters.
My only real complaint with the game its there decision not to support multigpu on an engine that has demonstrated excellent multigpu support in BF3/BF4, not really sure what is going on here. I am not going to buy a Titan XP to play this game at 4k, when we all know that anything >=390/970 multigpu setup will run this game in 4k all day.
I’ll admit I have played this BF title a lot less than the others because of performance. Sometimes I can play OK but a lot of times it’s just too laggy for me.
That being said in no way is this game dying off. BF1 still has a good amount of traffic.
BF1 over the last couple days hitting 74K https://battlefieldtracker.com/bf1/insights/population
Compared to BF4, about 18K https://bf4stats.com/