# Will there ever be a Battlefield game with more than 32 players per team?

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [February 14, 2018, 3:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225 "2018-02-14T03:12:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chimp\_Pilot](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Chimp\_Pilot](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Chimp_Pilot)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 3:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/1 "2018-02-14T03:12:00Z")

</div>

Even if its a small amount, enough to fill 7 full squads instead of 6.25 squads currently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roy57on](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/roy57on/32/103312_2.png) [@Roy57on](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Roy57on)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 3:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/2 "2018-02-14T03:19:00Z")

</div>

Battle Royale-style games are able to hold more than 64 players in one server so I believe it is possible, but not in the near future for the Battlefield franchise. If it does happen, I believe it will be following on from the success of another game that has successfully implemented it and created a demand for that style of play.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlotOfThunder](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/alotofthunder/32/101184_2.png) [@AlotOfThunder](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/AlotOfThunder)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 3:30am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/3 "2018-02-14T03:30:00Z")

</div>

i believe there were mods for bf1942 that allowed more than 64p

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobsAndVegane](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/0ea827/32.png) [@BobsAndVegane](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BobsAndVegane)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 5:01am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/4 "2018-02-14T05:01:00Z")

</div>

I’d honestly rather not, as long as they keep the maps as cramped as they are. Adding more people would just make it worse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![STUTE24](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/5f8ce5/32.png) [@STUTE24](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/STUTE24)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 6:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/5 "2018-02-14T18:02:00Z")

</div>

You could try Planetside 2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![trip1ex](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/779978/32.png) [@trip1ex](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/trip1ex)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 6:12pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/6 "2018-02-14T18:12:00Z")

</div>

if you want really laggy sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/marxistdictator/32/102751_2.png) [@MarxistDictator](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MarxistDictator)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 6:13pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/7 "2018-02-14T18:13:00Z")

</div>

Less is more to me. I’d rather have a smoother gameplay experience than more idiots on my team/sponges to shoot at.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clouseau2112](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/cab0a1/32.png) [@clouseau2112](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/clouseau2112)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 7:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/8 "2018-02-14T19:21:00Z")

</div>

I would love to see 50 vs 50.  
If they can make 64 work, there’s no reason DICE can’t do 100 player Conquest

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![x\_Undaunted\_x](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/x_undaunted_x/32/104094_2.png) [@x\_Undaunted\_x](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/x_Undaunted_x)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 7:25pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/9 "2018-02-14T19:25:00Z")

</div>

We don’t need more than 64. More players = more lag.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clouseau2112](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/cab0a1/32.png) [@clouseau2112](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/clouseau2112)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 7:41pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/10 "2018-02-14T19:41:00Z")

</div>

Well…maybe I’m part of the small % of players that rarely is effected by lag??

I run 200-300 down, 12 up.  
Maybe if more people paid for better internet, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lmaousine](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/lmaousine/32/102657_2.png) [@Lmaousine](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Lmaousine)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 7:45pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/11 "2018-02-14T19:45:00Z")

</div>

> [@clouseau2112](#):
>
> Well…maybe I’m part of the small % of players that rarely is effected by lag??
> 
> I run 200-300 down, 12 up.  
> Maybe if more people paid for better internet, right?

Yeah but then the people with McDonalds wifi would complain and DICE would punish you for having a good connection. Oh wait…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GVlXxf](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/eb8c5e/32.png) [@GVlXxf](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GVlXxf)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 8:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/12 "2018-02-14T20:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@Chimp\_Pilot](#):
>
> Even if its a small amount, enough to fill 7 full squads instead of 6.25 squads currently.

32 each is good enough for BF1, a great number and game experience, that u can have 32 squad, if each have one member only, so is it important to have certain number of squad in BF1??

i saw some do love to have only himself or two , like S&W tubers( i forget they full name)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clouseau2112](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/cab0a1/32.png) [@clouseau2112](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/clouseau2112)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2018, 8:20pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/13 "2018-02-14T20:20:00Z")

</div>

Hey…this is 2018. Ya just have to pay for what’s a priority. If you’re a halfway serious gamer, you should have to pay for a decent connection. Stick all the mofos with crappy connections in their own servers if ya ask me

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oskool\_007](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/oskool_007/32/103047_2.png) [@Oskool\_007](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Oskool_007)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 8:57am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/14 "2018-02-15T08:57:00Z")

</div>

I hope the player count increases. More players equals bigger battles, and big battles is a major feature that sets Battlefield apart from most of the other shooter games on the market.

I was upset when the Bad Company series reduced the player count. I’m also not interested in playing Incursions due to it’s small player count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DogRoyal](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@DogRoyal](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/DogRoyal)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 9:18am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/15 "2018-02-15T09:18:00Z")

</div>

50 vs 50 (or more!) would be great. They could start by adding it as another gamestyle like operations or Frontlines. Dont even have to make entirely new maps as they could just add a couple more flags to 3-4 existing maps and take it from there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Halcyon\_Creed\_N7](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/halcyon_creed_n7/32/100954_2.png) [@Halcyon\_Creed\_N7](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Halcyon_Creed_N7)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 11:39am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/16 "2018-02-15T11:39:00Z")

</div>

No, thanks. 64 is enough and even that can be a clusterfun on some maps. I can’t imagine how horrible more players would be. Also, the current technology can’t really support it. Obviously one of the big changes between titles is better graphics, but because consoles, specifically, have finite resources to work with better graphics means lower performance elsewhere. If we already get situations with lag, I can’t imagine how servers will be with 100 players and increased graphical strain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/eb8c5e/32.png) [@ninjapenquinuk](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ninjapenquinuk)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 12:50pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/17 "2018-02-15T12:50:00Z")

</div>

Of course its possible. An old PC FPS used to have 128 back when i was using a PC rather than my PS4. Whether it’s needed is another thing though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_DarIing](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/captain_dariing/32/101459_2.png) [@Captain\_DarIing](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Captain_DarIing)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 1:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/18 "2018-02-15T13:03:00Z")

</div>

Will there ever be a BF game with modes and maps truly made for 64p?

Many maps were never made for 64p in BF1. Gameplay goes down the drain because of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NANACHl](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/e95f7d/32.png) [@NANACHl](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/NANACHl)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 1:17pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/19 "2018-02-15T13:17:00Z")

</div>

I can imagine it but do not se the need,it is already pain to spawn anywhere and die instantly to spawnkiller,explosion etc.

I’ve played some games with 500vs500 it was lots of lag and bad hit reg

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EdwinSpangler](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/edwinspangler/32/101832_2.png) [@EdwinSpangler](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/EdwinSpangler)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 1:44pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225/20 "2018-02-15T13:44:00Z")

</div>

Ive wondered about not only that idea, but the idea of having more than two teams competing on a map.. Dont think either will ever happen tho..

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/will-there-ever-be-a-battlefield-game-with-more-than-32-players-per-team/259225.md?page=2)
