# Woman voice: "you lost object A"

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 12, 2016, 9:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838 "2016-06-12T21:42:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 2:02pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/221 "2016-07-04T14:02:00Z")

</div>

> [@Congaz](#):
>
> > [@KDNS](#):
> >
> > > [@jastonas](#):
> > >
> > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > 
> > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> 
> Saying forums only shows what 1% of the community wants is so wrong..

## [Link to section: It is absolutely not wrong.](#it-is-absolutely-not-wrong-1)It is absolutely not wrong.

## [Link to section: Have you taken a look at how many people access this forum currently per day? There’s 60 online right now. Yesterday the max peak was around 130.](#have-you-taken-a-look-at-how-many-people-access-this-forum-currently-per-day-theres-60-online-right-now-yesterday-the-max-peak-was-around-130-2)Have you taken a look at how many people access this forum currently per day? There’s 60 online right now. Yesterday the max peak was around 130.

## [Link to section: There are going to be MILLIONS of people playing this game, and there are currently millions talking about. There could be DOUBLE the number of current daily forum members here discussing things, and](#there-are-going-to-be-millions-of-people-playing-this-game-and-there-are-currently-millions-talking-about-there-could-be-double-the-number-of-current-daily-forum-members-here-discussing-things-and-it-will-still-be-less-than-1-of-the-overall-playerbase-3)There are going to be MILLIONS of people playing this game, and there are currently millions talking about. There could be DOUBLE the number of current daily forum members here discussing things, and it will still be less than 1% of the overall playerbase.

## [Link to section: There are still 100,000+ daily BF4 players, the 130 average peak users per day on this forum is 0.13% of just the daily players of BF4, let alone everyone that’s going to be playing BF1 at launch.](#there-are-still-100000-daily-bf4-players-the-130-average-peak-users-per-day-on-this-forum-is-013-of-just-the-daily-players-of-bf4-let-alone-everyone-thats-going-to-be-playing-bf1-at-launch-4)There are still 100,000+ daily BF4 players, the 130 average peak users per day on this forum is **0.13%** of just the daily players of BF4, let alone everyone that’s going to be playing BF1 at launch.

So saying that this forum represents less than 1% of the overall BF playerbase is absolutely true. Hell, we don’t even represent 1% of the BF4 playerbase.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KDNS](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/ce73a5/32.png) [@KDNS](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KDNS)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 2:09pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/222 "2016-07-04T14:09:00Z")

</div>

> [@Congaz](#):
>
> > [@KDNS](#):
> >
> > > [@jastonas](#):
> > >
> > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > 
> > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> 
> What says the Other % that do not hang on the forums dont feels the same?

Well, we don’t know what they think because they aren’t here to tell us 😉 We just don’t know…

> [@](#):
>
> Of the people ive talked about bf1 with, everyone Would rather see a change than keeping the voice that we have now, and no its not becouse its a woman.

Yeh, I called for radio crackle over the voice, as soon as I heard it.

> [@](#):
>
> Edit: Sorry My English is not the best, but hope you guys understand what i try to say.

I think your English is excellent! If you hadn’t said anything about it, I would have assumed it was your first language. GG.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/congaz/32/101550_2.png) [@Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Congaz)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 3:40pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/223 "2016-07-04T15:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@Loqtrall](#):
>
> > [@Congaz](#):
> >
> > > [@KDNS](#):
> > >
> > > > [@jastonas](#):
> > > >
> > > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > > 
> > > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> > 
> > Saying forums only shows what 1% of the community wants is so wrong..
> 
> ## It is absolutely not wrong.
> 
> ## Have you taken a look at how many people access this forum currently per day? There’s 60 online right now. Yesterday the max peak was around 130.
> 
> ## There are going to be MILLIONS of people playing this game, and there are currently millions talking about. There could be DOUBLE the number of current daily forum members here discussing things, and it will still be less than 1% of the overall playerbase.
> 
> ## There are still 100,000+ daily BF4 players, the 130 average peak users per day on this forum is **0.13%** of just the daily players of BF4, let alone everyone that’s going to be playing BF1 at launch.
> 
> So saying that this forum represents less than 1% of the overall BF playerbase is absolutely true. Hell, we don’t even represent 1% of the BF4 playerbase.

This does still not change the fact that most people of this forum, other forums and other social places just dont like it. thats how readings is done all over the world, you ask a couple of people, and look at the results of what they want.

i dont know, there are maybe 5 in this thread? that likes the voice and how many does not like it? look at youtube, twitch stream chat, facebook, reddit, friends(if you have some that play) i bet there is more who does not like it than people who likes it. i would sum it up to around 90% of what i have seen that wants a change, but as i said i think its more like 70% because alot of people just dont care, but why ignore us who actualy do care?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/congaz/32/101550_2.png) [@Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Congaz)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 3:43pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/224 "2016-07-04T15:43:00Z")

</div>

KDNS:

Yeh, I called for radio crackle over the voice, as soon as I heard it.

,  
yeah i liked this idea, but it would still be strange since there was not any portable radios during ww1:/ just stationary. it would make sense to hear it from a nearby soldier or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 3:49pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/225 "2016-07-04T15:49:00Z")

</div>

> [@Congaz](#):
>
> > [@Loqtrall](#):
> >
> > > [@Congaz](#):
> > >
> > > > [@KDNS](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@jastonas](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > > > 
> > > > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> > > 
> > > Saying forums only shows what 1% of the community wants is so wrong..
> > 
> > ## It is absolutely not wrong.
> > 
> > ## Have you taken a look at how many people access this forum currently per day? There’s 60 online right now. Yesterday the max peak was around 130.
> > 
> > ## There are going to be MILLIONS of people playing this game, and there are currently millions talking about. There could be DOUBLE the number of current daily forum members here discussing things, and it will still be less than 1% of the overall playerbase.
> > 
> > ## There are still 100,000+ daily BF4 players, the 130 average peak users per day on this forum is **0.13%** of just the daily players of BF4, let alone everyone that’s going to be playing BF1 at launch.
> > 
> > So saying that this forum represents less than 1% of the overall BF playerbase is absolutely true. Hell, we don’t even represent 1% of the BF4 playerbase.
> 
> This does still not change the fact that most people of this forum, other forums and other social places just dont like it. thats how readings is done all over the world, you ask a couple of people, and look at the results of what they want.
> 
> i dont know, there are maybe 5 in this thread? that likes the voice and how many does not like it? look at youtube, twitch stream chat, facebook, reddit, friends(if you have some that play) i bet there is more who does not like it than people who likes it. i would sum it up to around 90% of what i have seen that wants a change, but as i said i think its more like 70% because alot of people just dont care, but why ignore us who actualy do care?

I wasn’t addressing whether or not people like the announcer’s voice - I was addressing you saying that Poolshark saying this forum represents only less than 1% of the forum is “so wrong” - because what he said is absolutely true. The members on this forum represent less than 0.10% of the overall Battlefield playerbase, that’s a statistical fact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KDNS](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/k/ce73a5/32.png) [@KDNS](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/KDNS)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 4:30pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/226 "2016-07-04T16:30:00Z")

</div>

> [@Congaz](#):
>
> > [@KDNS](#):
> >
> > Yeh, I called for radio crackle over the voice, as soon as I heard it.
> 
> yeah i liked this idea, but it would still be strange since there was not any portable radios during ww1:/ just stationary. it would make sense to hear it from a nearby soldier or something.

Yeh totally that would be awesome. I was just trying to think of a simple improvement. If they went as far as your suggestion, well, GG.

As for the 1% thing… I never said that. I have no idea what the number is. But I can certainly tell you, whether it’s 1% or 50%, that it does not represent the entire spectrum of opinions which are present in the ‘other %’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![En1gmuh](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/53a042/32.png) [@En1gmuh](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/En1gmuh)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 7:53pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/227 "2016-07-04T19:53:00Z")

</div>

Just give us the option to disable it please. I did find it annoying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrTekku](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/mrtekku/32/102890_2.png) [@MrTekku](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/MrTekku)\
**Post date:** [July 4, 2016, 8:21pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/228 "2016-07-04T20:21:00Z")

</div>

I’d like to think of the voice as an angel on my shoulder. “It’s going to be ok! Capture objective B; you can do it!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GraveyardPolka](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/graveyardpolka/32/102111_2.png) [@GraveyardPolka](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GraveyardPolka)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 8:33am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/229 "2016-07-05T08:33:00Z")

</div>

> [@MrTekku](#):
>
> I’d like to think of the voice as an angel on my shoulder. “It’s going to be ok! Capture objective B; you can do it!”

That’s brilliant. You get her when you equip “Pocket Bible.” Other religions get other voices. And non-religious get the screaming officer on the field.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/congaz/32/101550_2.png) [@Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Congaz)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 10:06am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/230 "2016-07-05T10:06:00Z")

</div>

^I would like a screaming officer over some imaginary voice than

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![llGhostGamingll](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/9fc29f/32.png) [@llGhostGamingll](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/llGhostGamingll)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 11:00am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/231 "2016-07-05T11:00:00Z")

</div>

Kind of agree here, not because she’s a woman or because she’s English. More so just because she sounds like an emotionless robot, she doesn’t exactly instil you with the will to fight a war on a Battlefield.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GalaxyMix](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/df788c/32.png) [@GalaxyMix](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/GalaxyMix)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 11:06am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/232 "2016-07-05T11:06:00Z")

</div>

who does not like a soothing woman voice?

game or no game…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![V2Face](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/v2face/32/103961_2.png) [@V2Face](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/V2Face)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 12:31pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/233 "2016-07-05T12:31:00Z")

</div>

A lot of the woman voice “doesn’t suit the battlefield experience” talk its thinly veiled sexism in my opinion. It does not bother me or make me not want to buy the game. I hope they keep the voice and stop appealing to misogynistic fanboys and children.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jastonas](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/4da419/32.png) [@jastonas](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/jastonas)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 2:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/234 "2016-07-05T14:01:00Z")

</div>

> [@KDNS](#):
>
> > [@jastonas](#):
> >
> > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> 
> Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.

You guys don’t get it. That’s how samples and statistics work.

You might have 1.000.000 players, and 100 forum members. 100, is a sample that more or less, will represent the will of the majority.

Have you ever seen any polls? They take samples of 1% and less, and yet, most times they seem to be accurate.

This forum, is a microcosm of the Battlefield community.

Our stat readings would be wrong on the concerned issue, if this was some really special place where there was a really strange demographic of people. Yet, it’s… [battlefield.com](http://battlefield.com). I mean… come on!!

And the stat readings come from all over the place, as it has been stated over and over again.

YouTube, Reddit, Articles and comments, etc etc. People seem to dislike it. A lot of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IIGrimoII](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/iigrimoii/32/105599_2.png) [@IIGrimoII](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/IIGrimoII)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 2:57pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/235 "2016-07-05T14:57:00Z")

</div>

+1 for a man voice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/congaz/32/101550_2.png) [@Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Congaz)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 4:24pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/236 "2016-07-05T16:24:00Z")

</div>

> [@jastonas](#):
>
> > [@KDNS](#):
> >
> > > [@jastonas](#):
> > >
> > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > 
> > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> 
> You guys don’t get it. That’s how samples and statistics work.
> 
> You might have 1.000.000 players, and 100 forum members. 100, is a sample that more or less, will represent the will of the majority.
> 
> Have you ever seen any polls? They take samples of 1% and less, and yet, most times they seem to be accurate.
> 
> This forum, is a microcosm of the Battlefield community.
> 
> Our stat readings would be wrong on the concerned issue, if this was some really special place where there was a really strange demographic of people. Yet, it’s… [battlefield.com](http://battlefield.com). I mean… come on!!
> 
> And the stat readings come from all over the place, as it has been stated over and over again.
> 
> YouTube, Reddit, Articles and comments, etc etc. People seem to dislike it. A lot of them.

thank you! this is exactly what ive been trying to say, only you did it 10x better 🙂

And to the guy who said its sexism? lol. and children? when is someone a child for you? im 22 and my friends are from 20-32 thay yet still thinks the same, and no, we have NOTHING against that its a woman voice. its the way of the voice, but i would still prefer a man and that is no sexism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 4:26pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/237 "2016-07-05T16:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@V2Face](#):
>
> A lot of the woman voice “doesn’t suit the battlefield experience” talk its thinly veiled sexism in my opinion.

lmao, are you \*\*\* serious?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kesolb](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/kesolb/32/102490_2.png) [@kesolb](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/kesolb)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 4:37pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/238 "2016-07-05T16:37:00Z")

</div>

I hope we get a separate volume slider to adjust or turn off the voice over. I prefer looking at the flag status too see what flags we are losing/have lost, and that squad orders will be marked visually. No matter how this voice ends up i know i will get quite tired of it fast.

There is a lot of amazing audio in BF, and i do not need or want a voice telling me something i can easily see visually, and in the process drown out more important and amazing sounds.

As long as i can disable it, it no matter to me:)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cnedden](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/cnedden/32/101539_2.png) [@cnedden](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/cnedden)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 5:01pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/239 "2016-07-05T17:01:00Z")

</div>

> [@jastonas](#):
>
> > [@KDNS](#):
> >
> > > [@jastonas](#):
> > >
> > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > 
> > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> 
> You guys don’t get it. That’s how samples and statistics work.
> 
> You might have 1.000.000 players, and 100 forum members. 100, is a sample that more or less, will represent the will of the majority.
> 
> Have you ever seen any polls? They take samples of 1% and less, and yet, most times they seem to be accurate.
> 
> This forum, is a microcosm of the Battlefield community.
> 
> Our stat readings would be wrong on the concerned issue, if this was some really special place where there was a really strange demographic of people. Yet, it’s… [battlefield.com](http://battlefield.com). I mean… come on!!
> 
> And the stat readings come from all over the place, as it has been stated over and over again.
> 
> YouTube, Reddit, Articles and comments, etc etc. People seem to dislike it. A lot of them.

Yea this is all true. The only people that will argue against this are the ones that didn’t pass math in high school

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trokey66](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/trokey66/32/103889_2.png) [@Trokey66](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Trokey66)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2016, 5:54pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/240 "2016-07-05T17:54:00Z")

</div>

> [@cnedden](#):
>
> > [@jastonas](#):
> >
> > > [@KDNS](#):
> > >
> > > > [@jastonas](#):
> > > >
> > > > Yet, isn’t a forum and it’s active members supposed to be representative of what the majority actually wants.
> > > 
> > > Not really. It’s only a representation of the opinions of the people who hang out on the forums. Most players don’t do that.
> > 
> > You guys don’t get it. That’s how samples and statistics work.
> > 
> > You might have 1.000.000 players, and 100 forum members. 100, is a sample that more or less, will represent the will of the majority.
> > 
> > Have you ever seen any polls? They take samples of 1% and less, and yet, most times they seem to be accurate.
> > 
> > This forum, is a microcosm of the Battlefield community.
> > 
> > Our stat readings would be wrong on the concerned issue, if this was some really special place where there was a really strange demographic of people. Yet, it’s… [battlefield.com](http://battlefield.com). I mean… come on!!
> > 
> > And the stat readings come from all over the place, as it has been stated over and over again.
> > 
> > YouTube, Reddit, Articles and comments, etc etc. People seem to dislike it. A lot of them.
> 
> Yea this is all true. The only people that will argue against this are the ones that didn’t pass math in high school

The smaller the sample, the less reliable the assumption.

I would suggest that a sample of less than 1% is pretty unreliable.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838.md?page=11)

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838.md?page=13)
