# Woman voice: "you lost object A"

**URL:** <https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [June 12, 2016, 9:42pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838 "2016-06-12T21:42:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 4:45pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/161 "2016-06-23T16:45:00Z")

</div>

> [@Bertominus\_Rex](#):
>
> > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> >
> > > [@Congaz](#):
> > >
> > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@Mr7Beans](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > They’re probably going to change it.  
> > > > > however i hope they don’t change the objective names (Apples, Butter, Charlie, Duff etc..)  
> > > > > it suits the game way more than the modern ones.
> > > > 
> > > > They aren’t changing it
> > > > 
> > > > It has been in for at least 6 months, if it was a place holder, it would have been changed for the alpha
> > > 
> > > As mentioned, Dice has heard nothing about this before the live stream vent live. Alot of people have spoken out about it now. im willing to say its the discussion with most threads over the forums, not just this one.
> > > 
> > > Yet again, time will tell. If it get changed, kept or an On/Off switch for it is something we will discover on the launch or later dlc/patches.
> > 
> > Turning it off would go against its purpose. It serves as an aid for oblivious people.
> > 
> > They have heard discussions. The live stream is not the first tine people have seen this game. There have been numerous playtest/feedback session, multiple game changer settings, etc. The voice was brought up, and the choice was explained, but I can’t discuss it as I am under NDA. If they feel the need to justify the artistic direction of THEIR game, they can.
> > 
> > In the end, this is their vision, and having something that irritates a small number of players that has no bearing on gameplay, is probably not a huge priority to them.
> 
> If it actually annoys the player enough that they want to disable it, then it’s their choice. If I want to disable the HUD and have an inherit disadvantage, the game allows me to.
> 
> Allowing for this to be turned off in the settings would be the easiest compromise to make, and it wouldn’t affect Dice’s vision of the game. The game is as they want it, but players have the option to alter the experience to their liking.

I disagree, they have the option to alter their experience to DICE’s liking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 4:59pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/162 "2016-06-23T16:59:00Z")

</div>

> [@ThePoolshark](#):
>
> > [@pss4dm](#):
> >
> > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > >
> > > > [@Congaz](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > > [@Mr7Beans](#):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They’re probably going to change it.  
> > > > > > however i hope they don’t change the objective names (Apples, Butter, Charlie, Duff etc..)  
> > > > > > it suits the game way more than the modern ones.
> > > > > 
> > > > > They aren’t changing it
> > > > > 
> > > > > It has been in for at least 6 months, if it was a place holder, it would have been changed for the alpha
> > > > 
> > > > As mentioned, Dice has heard nothing about this before the live stream vent live. Alot of people have spoken out about it now. im willing to say its the discussion with most threads over the forums, not just this one.
> > > > 
> > > > Yet again, time will tell. If it get changed, kept or an On/Off switch for it is something we will discover on the launch or later dlc/patches.
> > > 
> > > Turning it off would go against its purpose. It serves as an aid for oblivious people.
> > > 
> > > They have heard discussions. The live stream is not the first tine people have seen this game. There have been numerous playtest/feedback session, multiple game changer settings, etc. The voice was brought up, and the choice was explained, but I can’t discuss it as I am under NDA. If they feel the need to justify the artistic direction of THEIR game, they can.
> > > 
> > > In the end, this is their vision, and having something that irritates a small number of players that has no bearing on gameplay, is probably not a huge priority to them.
> > > 
> > > This whole thing is akin to someone who is not a painter walking into an art gallery criticizing a piece for not being what they want. Same thing, this is a piece of art fron DICE, and no matter how much you armchair developers complain, I hope they don’t touch it. Their vision, their game… either buy it or don’t
> > 
> > I find it hard to believe that it is only an insignificant portion of battlefield community that have a problem with the announcer.
> 
> This forum is a miniscule percentage of the community. This thread is only has a miniscule percentage of users conpared to the forum. The math is easy in my eyes

THANK YOU.

Man, I can’t believe how hard it is to get things through to people that 5 guys agreeing with each other in a thread does not count as a significant chunk of the community. I mean, there’re way more people in this case agreeing with each other, but it’s ridiculous how many threads there are where 4-5 dudes agree with each other and proclaim the change is wanted by nearly everyone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pss4dm](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/a6a055/32.png) [@pss4dm](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/pss4dm)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 5:03pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/163 "2016-06-23T17:03:00Z")

</div>

> [@ThePoolshark](#):
>
> > [@pss4dm](#):
> >
> > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > >
> > > > [@Congaz](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > > [@Mr7Beans](#):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They’re probably going to change it.  
> > > > > > however i hope they don’t change the objective names (Apples, Butter, Charlie, Duff etc..)  
> > > > > > it suits the game way more than the modern ones.
> > > > > 
> > > > > They aren’t changing it
> > > > > 
> > > > > It has been in for at least 6 months, if it was a place holder, it would have been changed for the alpha
> > > > 
> > > > As mentioned, Dice has heard nothing about this before the live stream vent live. Alot of people have spoken out about it now. im willing to say its the discussion with most threads over the forums, not just this one.
> > > > 
> > > > Yet again, time will tell. If it get changed, kept or an On/Off switch for it is something we will discover on the launch or later dlc/patches.
> > > 
> > > Turning it off would go against its purpose. It serves as an aid for oblivious people.
> > > 
> > > They have heard discussions. The live stream is not the first tine people have seen this game. There have been numerous playtest/feedback session, multiple game changer settings, etc. The voice was brought up, and the choice was explained, but I can’t discuss it as I am under NDA. If they feel the need to justify the artistic direction of THEIR game, they can.
> > > 
> > > In the end, this is their vision, and having something that irritates a small number of players that has no bearing on gameplay, is probably not a huge priority to them.
> > > 
> > > This whole thing is akin to someone who is not a painter walking into an art gallery criticizing a piece for not being what they want. Same thing, this is a piece of art fron DICE, and no matter how much you armchair developers complain, I hope they don’t touch it. Their vision, their game… either buy it or don’t
> > 
> > I find it hard to believe that it is only an insignificant portion of battlefield community that have a problem with the announcer.
> 
> This forum is a miniscule percentage of the community. This thread is only has a miniscule percentage of users conpared to the forum. The math is easy in my eyes

I understand that and I am not basing my judgement on that. I just think a lot of people play battlefield for the same reasons I do and have a feeling that a lot of people will similarly be irritated by it. I might be wrong its just conjecture on my part. But unless you have done some kind of market survey of battlefield players I don’t know how you can offer anything different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![A\_Cool\_Gorilla](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/a_cool_gorilla/32/101122_2.png) [@A\_Cool\_Gorilla](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/A_Cool_Gorilla)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 5:05pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/164 "2016-06-23T17:05:00Z")

</div>

> [@ThePoolshark](#):
>
> > [@Bertominus\_Rex](#):
> >
> > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > >
> > > > [@Congaz](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > > [@Mr7Beans](#):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They’re probably going to change it.  
> > > > > > however i hope they don’t change the objective names (Apples, Butter, Charlie, Duff etc..)  
> > > > > > it suits the game way more than the modern ones.
> > > > > 
> > > > > They aren’t changing it
> > > > > 
> > > > > It has been in for at least 6 months, if it was a place holder, it would have been changed for the alpha
> > > > 
> > > > As mentioned, Dice has heard nothing about this before the live stream vent live. Alot of people have spoken out about it now. im willing to say its the discussion with most threads over the forums, not just this one.
> > > > 
> > > > Yet again, time will tell. If it get changed, kept or an On/Off switch for it is something we will discover on the launch or later dlc/patches.
> > > 
> > > Turning it off would go against its purpose. It serves as an aid for oblivious people.
> > > 
> > > They have heard discussions. The live stream is not the first tine people have seen this game. There have been numerous playtest/feedback session, multiple game changer settings, etc. The voice was brought up, and the choice was explained, but I can’t discuss it as I am under NDA. If they feel the need to justify the artistic direction of THEIR game, they can.
> > > 
> > > In the end, this is their vision, and having something that irritates a small number of players that has no bearing on gameplay, is probably not a huge priority to them.
> > 
> > If it actually annoys the player enough that they want to disable it, then it’s their choice. If I want to disable the HUD and have an inherit disadvantage, the game allows me to.
> > 
> > Allowing for this to be turned off in the settings would be the easiest compromise to make, and it wouldn’t affect Dice’s vision of the game. The game is as they want it, but players have the option to alter the experience to their liking.
> 
> I disagree, they have the option to alter their experience to DICE’s liking.

There’s no way I can agree with that. Every developer has a vision of what they want the game to be, but they still have to consider the interests of the player. It’s a product, after all. This only becomes a problem if the interests of the player conflict with the developers vision to a considerable degree (eg. removing it entirely as opposed to having an option to disable it).

Is disabling the HUD a part of their vision? If these options are a part of their vision, then why isn’t the ability to disable the voice a part of it as well? This is why I don’t even see settings as being within this scope. It’s a slippery slope when player preferences are argued to be within their vision.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChivasUK](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/chivasuk/32/101508_2.png) [@ChivasUK](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ChivasUK)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 5:10pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/165 "2016-06-23T17:10:00Z")

</div>

I like it, women had a significant role in WW1, not only as nurses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/thepoolshark/32/103801_2.png) [@ThePoolshark](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ThePoolshark)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 5:19pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/166 "2016-06-23T17:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@Bertominus\_Rex](#):
>
> > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> >
> > > [@Bertominus\_Rex](#):
> > >
> > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@Congaz](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [@Mr7Beans](#):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > They’re probably going to change it.  
> > > > > > > however i hope they don’t change the objective names (Apples, Butter, Charlie, Duff etc..)  
> > > > > > > it suits the game way more than the modern ones.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > They aren’t changing it
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It has been in for at least 6 months, if it was a place holder, it would have been changed for the alpha
> > > > > 
> > > > > As mentioned, Dice has heard nothing about this before the live stream vent live. Alot of people have spoken out about it now. im willing to say its the discussion with most threads over the forums, not just this one.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yet again, time will tell. If it get changed, kept or an On/Off switch for it is something we will discover on the launch or later dlc/patches.
> > > > 
> > > > Turning it off would go against its purpose. It serves as an aid for oblivious people.
> > > > 
> > > > They have heard discussions. The live stream is not the first tine people have seen this game. There have been numerous playtest/feedback session, multiple game changer settings, etc. The voice was brought up, and the choice was explained, but I can’t discuss it as I am under NDA. If they feel the need to justify the artistic direction of THEIR game, they can.
> > > > 
> > > > In the end, this is their vision, and having something that irritates a small number of players that has no bearing on gameplay, is probably not a huge priority to them.
> > > 
> > > If it actually annoys the player enough that they want to disable it, then it’s their choice. If I want to disable the HUD and have an inherit disadvantage, the game allows me to.
> > > 
> > > Allowing for this to be turned off in the settings would be the easiest compromise to make, and it wouldn’t affect Dice’s vision of the game. The game is as they want it, but players have the option to alter the experience to their liking.
> > 
> > I disagree, they have the option to alter their experience to DICE’s liking.
> 
> There’s no way I can agree with that. Every developer has a vision of what they want the game to be, but they still have to consider the interests of the player. It’s a product, after all. This only becomes a problem if the interests of the player conflict with the developers vision to a considerable degree (eg. removing it entirely as opposed to having an option to disable it).
> 
> Is disabling the HUD a part of their vision? If these options are a part of their vision, then why isn’t the ability to disable the voice a part of it as well? This is why I don’t even see settings as being within this scope. It’s a slippery slope when player preferences are argued to be within their vision.

HUD is not even close to the same thing. They love cinematics, so it only makes sense for them to allow removal of the HUD

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![A\_Cool\_Gorilla](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/a_cool_gorilla/32/101122_2.png) [@A\_Cool\_Gorilla](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/A_Cool_Gorilla)\
**Post date:** [June 23, 2016, 5:45pm UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/167 "2016-06-23T17:45:00Z")

</div>

> [@ThePoolshark](#):
>
> > [@Bertominus\_Rex](#):
> >
> > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > >
> > > > [@Bertominus\_Rex](#):
> > > >
> > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > > >
> > > > > > [@Congaz](#):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [@ThePoolshark](#):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [@Mr7Beans](#):
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > They’re probably going to change it.  
> > > > > > > > however i hope they don’t change the objective names (Apples, Butter, Charlie, Duff etc..)  
> > > > > > > > it suits the game way more than the modern ones.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > They aren’t changing it
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It has been in for at least 6 months, if it was a place holder, it would have been changed for the alpha
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > As mentioned, Dice has heard nothing about this before the live stream vent live. Alot of people have spoken out about it now. im willing to say its the discussion with most threads over the forums, not just this one.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yet again, time will tell. If it get changed, kept or an On/Off switch for it is something we will discover on the launch or later dlc/patches.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Turning it off would go against its purpose. It serves as an aid for oblivious people.
> > > > > 
> > > > > They have heard discussions. The live stream is not the first tine people have seen this game. There have been numerous playtest/feedback session, multiple game changer settings, etc. The voice was brought up, and the choice was explained, but I can’t discuss it as I am under NDA. If they feel the need to justify the artistic direction of THEIR game, they can.
> > > > > 
> > > > > In the end, this is their vision, and having something that irritates a small number of players that has no bearing on gameplay, is probably not a huge priority to them.
> > > > 
> > > > If it actually annoys the player enough that they want to disable it, then it’s their choice. If I want to disable the HUD and have an inherit disadvantage, the game allows me to.
> > > > 
> > > > Allowing for this to be turned off in the settings would be the easiest compromise to make, and it wouldn’t affect Dice’s vision of the game. The game is as they want it, but players have the option to alter the experience to their liking.
> > > 
> > > I disagree, they have the option to alter their experience to DICE’s liking.
> > 
> > There’s no way I can agree with that. Every developer has a vision of what they want the game to be, but they still have to consider the interests of the player. It’s a product, after all. This only becomes a problem if the interests of the player conflict with the developers vision to a considerable degree (eg. removing it entirely as opposed to having an option to disable it).
> > 
> > Is disabling the HUD a part of their vision? If these options are a part of their vision, then why isn’t the ability to disable the voice a part of it as well? This is why I don’t even see settings as being within this scope. It’s a slippery slope when player preferences are argued to be within their vision.
> 
> HUD is not even close to the same thing. They love cinematics, so it only makes sense for them to allow removal of the HUD

That’s true, the HUD example wasn’t good. Ultimately, my argument is: if player preferences are a part of their vision, then where’s the line drawn?

Why shouldn’t an optional feature be added in if it pleases a minority of players? If even 1% of players use it, then that’s still a big number considering how many players actually play the series.

The only argument I’ve heard for its benefit is that it provides useful information through audio to the player. Does this actually outweigh the cons? Admittedly, the cons aren’t large… but neither are the pros. Sound doesn’t really impact my performance by a considerable degree. The visual queues alone are enough to let me play effectively, and so additional audio queues don’t have a large impact on my experience.

I’m sure Dice has discussed this in length, but I just can’t wrap my head around it. Why wouldn’t an optional feature be a good thing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/congaz/32/101550_2.png) [@Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Congaz)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 3:38am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/168 "2016-06-24T03:38:00Z")

</div>

This forum is a miniscule percentage of the community. This thread is only has a miniscule percentage of users conpared to the forum. The math is easy in my eyes[/quote]

Pool, this is not the only thread on the forums about this. This is not the only forum that involve threads about this.

Just Go to youtube, reddit, Facebook or any Other social places and you Will see people who are not Happy about this.

Everyone i know who is super hyped for the game have one thing in common, they all dislike this woman voice, not only just My near friends but 99% of all i heard talked about the game actually finds the announcer annoying.

Even My girlfriend thout it sounded wrong when i asked her about the gameplay, and She is no gamer.

I Can do good without someone telling me what base we are loosing, i actually see it with My own eye’s. Would not be hard to make an option to turn it off for all the players who do not simply like it. Should not be such a big deal, right?

You cant say its just a tiny tiny part of the community who Does not want it, of all My friends and cousin who do not like it, Only me is on the forums. and im dmn sure its more than My friends who dislike it but just dont hang on the forums.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ReaperAdams](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/8e7dd6/32.png) [@ReaperAdams](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ReaperAdams)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 5:09am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/169 "2016-06-24T05:09:00Z")

</div>

I want Preston Garvey from FO4. “Soldier, I got word of another objective that needs our help.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![m1k3ol](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/eb9ed0/32.png) [@m1k3ol](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/m1k3ol)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 5:55am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/170 "2016-06-24T05:55:00Z")

</div>

Forums are usually only 2% of the player base…

Sure, stuff sounds louder on an echo room…

You know what other thing got asked more than this voice?, helis…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cujucuyo](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/bcef8e/32.png) [@Cujucuyo](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Cujucuyo)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 6:00am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/171 "2016-06-24T06:00:00Z")

</div>

This is what we need to replace that crappy voice they currently have, a sassy British Sargent:

[![Video: Monty Python ~ Marching up and down the square (Michael Palin)](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/d/6/d6bcc98fd23d4c9528c22ee00c32e1af06217a38.jpeg "Monty Python ~ Marching up and down the square (Michael Palin)") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLJ8ILIE780)

The current voice reminds me of the horrible “where did you learn to fly?” voice from Cybermorph:

[![Video: Where did you learn to fly? (11 minute loop)](https://battlefieldforum.co/uploads/default/original/3X/3/b/3b1ada33f441e058375f267eb7d0cb80ab1d73e5.jpeg "Where did you learn to fly? (11 minute loop)") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ObaiI30500)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amrbido\_9](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@amrbido\_9](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/amrbido_9)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 6:40am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/172 "2016-06-24T06:40:00Z")

</div>

Yea they need to change it asap

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/loqtrall/32/100975_2.png) [@Loqtrall](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Loqtrall)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 6:58am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/173 "2016-06-24T06:58:00Z")

</div>

Even if isn’t changed or removed by launch, I wouldn’t really mind that much. It’s honestly not that bad. But, I don’t think there are too many people who opposed to changing it. Won’t effect gameplay either way, and that’s all I’m worried about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/congaz/32/101550_2.png) [@Congaz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Congaz)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 6:59am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/174 "2016-06-24T06:59:00Z")

</div>

> [@m1k3ol](#):
>
> Forums are usually only 2% of the player base…
> 
> Sure, stuff sounds louder on an echo room…
> 
> You know what other thing got asked more than this voice?, helis…

Yes indeed it might be 2%, but Does not that show how big the group of people who want a change might be? If a large part of the 98% Also thinks like that but just dont come here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toxic\_CA](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/toxic_ca/32/103872_2.png) [@Toxic\_CA](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Toxic_CA)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 7:12am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/175 "2016-06-24T07:12:00Z")

</div>

Theres nothing wrong with having a female VO. The only thing she needs is more life in her voice. She sounds too much like a robot from the future and it breaks immersion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ForThemLulz](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/82dd89/32.png) [@ForThemLulz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/ForThemLulz)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 7:15am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/176 "2016-06-24T07:15:00Z")

</div>

it sounds futuristic, something that would make more sense in like a 2143 or something like that. i need some old time WWI dude yelling at me for BF1. then again, it’s just the alpha. i’m pretty damn sure they’re going to change it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SecondAmendmnt](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/secondamendmnt/32/103405_2.png) [@SecondAmendmnt](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/SecondAmendmnt)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 7:17am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/177 "2016-06-24T07:17:00Z")

</div>

Please change it to Snoop Dogg. “YOU HAVE LOST OBJECTIVE BIZZLE!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Toxic\_CA](https://battlefieldforum.co/user_avatar/battlefieldforum.co/toxic_ca/32/103872_2.png) [@Toxic\_CA](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/Toxic_CA)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 7:19am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/178 "2016-06-24T07:19:00Z")

</div>

> [@SecondAmendmnt](#):
>
> Please change it to Snoop Dogg. “YOU HAVE LOST OBJECTIVE BIZZLE!”

Oh

My

God

Yes

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![meowpewpewmeow](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@meowpewpewmeow](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/meowpewpewmeow)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 11:31am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/179 "2016-06-24T11:31:00Z")

</div>

would like if they make some voices to choose from. so those woman-phobic freaks was shutup.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BirdyBallzzzz](https://battlefieldforum.co/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/c6cbf5/32.png) [@BirdyBallzzzz](https://battlefieldforum.co/u/BirdyBallzzzz)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2016, 11:45am UTC](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838/180 "2016-06-24T11:45:00Z")

</div>

> [@ThePoolshark](#):
>
> This whole thing is akin to someone who is not a painter walking into an art gallery criticizing a piece for not being what they want. Same thing, this is a piece of art fron DICE, and no matter how much you armchair developers complain, I hope they don’t touch it. Their vision, their game… either buy it or don’t

Best way to explain it. People need to realize this.

[Previous page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://battlefieldforum.co/t/woman-voice-you-lost-object-a/101838.md?page=10)
