So saying that this forum represents less than 1% of the overall BF playerbase is absolutely true. Hell, we don’t even represent 1% of the BF4 playerbase.
This does still not change the fact that most people of this forum, other forums and other social places just dont like it. thats how readings is done all over the world, you ask a couple of people, and look at the results of what they want.
i dont know, there are maybe 5 in this thread? that likes the voice and how many does not like it? look at youtube, twitch stream chat, facebook, reddit, friends(if you have some that play) i bet there is more who does not like it than people who likes it. i would sum it up to around 90% of what i have seen that wants a change, but as i said i think its more like 70% because alot of people just dont care, but why ignore us who actualy do care?
Yeh, I called for radio crackle over the voice, as soon as I heard it.
,
yeah i liked this idea, but it would still be strange since there was not any portable radios during ww1:/ just stationary. it would make sense to hear it from a nearby soldier or something.
I wasn’t addressing whether or not people like the announcer’s voice - I was addressing you saying that Poolshark saying this forum represents only less than 1% of the forum is “so wrong” - because what he said is absolutely true. The members on this forum represent less than 0.10% of the overall Battlefield playerbase, that’s a statistical fact.
Yeh totally that would be awesome. I was just trying to think of a simple improvement. If they went as far as your suggestion, well, GG.
As for the 1% thing… I never said that. I have no idea what the number is. But I can certainly tell you, whether it’s 1% or 50%, that it does not represent the entire spectrum of opinions which are present in the ‘other %’.
That’s brilliant. You get her when you equip “Pocket Bible.” Other religions get other voices. And non-religious get the screaming officer on the field.
Kind of agree here, not because she’s a woman or because she’s English. More so just because she sounds like an emotionless robot, she doesn’t exactly instil you with the will to fight a war on a Battlefield.
A lot of the woman voice “doesn’t suit the battlefield experience” talk its thinly veiled sexism in my opinion. It does not bother me or make me not want to buy the game. I hope they keep the voice and stop appealing to misogynistic fanboys and children.
You guys don’t get it. That’s how samples and statistics work.
You might have 1.000.000 players, and 100 forum members. 100, is a sample that more or less, will represent the will of the majority.
Have you ever seen any polls? They take samples of 1% and less, and yet, most times they seem to be accurate.
This forum, is a microcosm of the Battlefield community.
Our stat readings would be wrong on the concerned issue, if this was some really special place where there was a really strange demographic of people. Yet, it’s… battlefield.com. I mean… come on!!
And the stat readings come from all over the place, as it has been stated over and over again.
YouTube, Reddit, Articles and comments, etc etc. People seem to dislike it. A lot of them.
thank you! this is exactly what ive been trying to say, only you did it 10x better
And to the guy who said its sexism? lol. and children? when is someone a child for you? im 22 and my friends are from 20-32 thay yet still thinks the same, and no, we have NOTHING against that its a woman voice. its the way of the voice, but i would still prefer a man and that is no sexism.
I hope we get a separate volume slider to adjust or turn off the voice over. I prefer looking at the flag status too see what flags we are losing/have lost, and that squad orders will be marked visually. No matter how this voice ends up i know i will get quite tired of it fast.
There is a lot of amazing audio in BF, and i do not need or want a voice telling me something i can easily see visually, and in the process drown out more important and amazing sounds.
We just don’t know…