If you mean movie characters, Leia was the classic one, but the new one has Rey, Captain Phasma. The Lore has plenty, like Mara Jade, half of Luke’s students… IN the other video games like KOTOR, Bastila was extremely popular… There are innumerable characters in Old Republic too. I don’t have Battlefront either, but I’m pretty sure it was a design criteria to have them included.
Misread the question my b. Idc honestly lol I’m just trying to do what you guys do. The main reason I don’t want women is its weird in my opinion. Like I already told Napoleonicus to me it’d be like playing a WW2 game and women fighting/ landing on Normandy. It doesn’t feel right. If it was modern or futuristic go ahead idc. It’s ww1 though and they where an extremely small minority in combat terms.
Doesn’t feel right, like in not realistic? I think in real life, when someone shoots you, you’re just dead. There is no respawning. Game over. So if bf was to mimic real life, you’d be out as soon as you were shot with no respawn for the whole match.
Most games I play have both male and female characters, including GTA 5. “If you’re red your dead” is my crew’s motto, woman or not. It’s about time Battlefield got with the times and finally offered women the opportunity to play as a female. It does for Black people after all. And that wasn’t always the case, as African American soldiers were not fully integrated until much later in American history, but no one thinks twice about that in Battlefield now. EA finally has the chance to get with the times instead of being stuck in the past. And as I said, if you want realistic, when you die, it should feel quite fake to respawn.
It may come as a shock but women do play these types of games. You could always choose to play as a male but let others make the decision for themselves.
Star Wars Battlefront has more freedom to incorporate female models and characters based on the setting. Not just the cinematic universe, but the EU and plenty of material had female pilots/combatants and the like. The difference here is It is a fictitious universe. Added with the underline of the whole plot being about a Rebellion. Of course a rebellion wouldn’t discriminate between which sex could or could not fight.
look at Frances Resistance fighting during WWII surely there were plenty of female combatants who took up arms to fight the oppression.
However, this is a game based on History. Granted it will of course likely take many liberties on some facts to better improve gameplay (experimental weapons, concepts and the like) but hopefully it will also give this tragic war it’s just due.
Female soldiers were just not a thing. It was unheard of. This is a time of the turn of the century. Political ideas where still very much the same to the century prior. And while there were movements to better the rights of women. It barely had begun and surely would not have reached the levels of the military. War was a gentlemen’s affair, viewed as a means of pride and national honor. The men when to fight and die for their country and to keep it and their families safe.
There should not be a need for telling DICE to “Get with the program” I’m sure they are plenty aware of current issues and their player base. But they should also Respect the material they are studying. There is no need for female soldiers to be here. As they were not a thing at the time. Again, the biggest examples being the Russian’s who held different idea’s on how to handle things and were of course doing so out of desperation on occasion.
If this were a battlefield set in a modern warzone or futuristic? Then yes, female soldiers would make sense and there’s no problem with having them. But in this war, it wasn’t at all as common and that should be respected.
Di you just read doesn’t feel right and skip the rest? It has nothing to do with realism Ik war is nothing like any of the battlefields. I’m saying it wouldn’t feel right like I already said women didn’t participate in most battles why include them just to be PC?
I love this thread. It pops up a few months before every Battlefield game has ever released, and the arguments never change. The devs never add females in, and on launch, nobody really cares one way or another.
Yes, but most of those women severed in so called “soft” jobs like drivers, communication, nurses.
Russia had 2000 women enlist into the army of which on 250 saw the front lines.
A more boys fought in WW1 then women even with the oversea services age was 19. There are many as young as 12 years old served with Navies around the world. It is estimated 250,000 boys severed with British(UK) army.
I’m in the Navy. The Yeoman is a rate in the navy responsible for administration. They are paper pushers in every since of the word, not trigger pullers. Women probably shouldn’t be in the game, and I loved the diversity in Star Wars Battlefront and other games.
Those are the very first, that means there were only a few women in the war during WW1 as soldier. If the game allows you to be a woman, like 50% of the game will be using it, just like in Battlefront, and in WW1 there were not that much women in the war, so it would be fake, and that’s not what Battlefield should be.
In videogames anything is of course possible, but dashing over the trenches for a bayonet charge and stabbing a female soldier on the opposite side would feel just a little bit too fictional.
And we’re not talking about “soft” jobs. The thread here is asking that there be female soldiers which was highly uncommon. Catering to the notion that “Battlefield needs to get with the times” and allow male/female soldiers to play as is great! Just not for this setting or period.
Really because that not at all how OP justified. Using science fiction, then quote article to highlight the role a few women played in WW1. Based on the logic of OP we should have child soldiers too.