I think that for conquest there should be 100 vs 100. I stress this mainly because the maps are huge and yes 64 is a lot but dont you guys think we could have more players. The ingame feeling of a war like battle going on would be the ultimate experience. Team death match could then use 32 vs 32.
I’ll take “Things that will never happen” for $800, Alex.
no 64 is fine,i know what your trying to say but 100 would become a clugged up mess.
200 man metro.
I don’t understand why people want more than 64 when the servers barely handle that kind of player at 30 tickrate.
to all: don’t feed the troll !
64 is already a mess, why would 200 be any better? I doubt the consoles could handle it anyways..
I would love it.
The more players, the better.
he’s trolling, don’t fall into the trap!
Only if they remove server browser and only allow quickmatch
I understand the appeal of a bigger game match. The thought I’m sure has crossed every players mind at least once. Be it in a positive light or other wise. As for DICE or EA doing it? Most likely not going to happen. But we have seen players and server runners themselves implement such ideas on their own. Granted only on one of the worst maps to do so (Metro) but it showed that it worked decently enough and that was in BF3. So with BF1’s engine I’m sure it could be worked to handle it. If a player took the time to figure it out by himself. Which hopefully someone will do if they feel obliged enough.
Plus it’s not like it would be the only game modes. You can still play base size 32v32. And smaller squad death matches. It’s all about just finding the right size for you. And thats what servers can do.
The more the merrier, and realistic as well. Servers would have to he hulks and the rigs people play on would have to be pretty hard hitting as well. It would make for some crazy firefights though!
100 vs 100 will bump the system requirements I believe by quiet a bit. Plus servers running such big matches won’t be that stable.
Most of these threads on this forum are troll ex COD players trying to make BF more like CoD…
Bump it up to 70 so 5-man squads are possible. (if there will be 5-man squads of course)
Game has already been confirmed for 64 players
According to Dice 48 (24 vs 24) players is optimum in standard conqust. If you want more players than 64 it becomes a clusterf*ck.
Unless they implement a hierarchie and commandsystem that actually worked.
I have plenty of ideas don’t worry. It will come in Battlefield:1944 hahaha
El alamein
100vs100, lots of planes and tanks and stuff.
Cant get any better than that.
Everyone’s computer and console would crash harder than a biplane…