I have a 1MS 144HZ 1440P monitor and a 1MS 60HZ IPS 4K Monitor and I’m going to be playing Battlefield on them. I’m not sure which one to play on, my PC can handle 144fps at 1440p and 60fps at 4k (I’m going to get 2 GTX 1080s when they come out). So would the smoothness of 144HZ really be that noticeable and helpful in a World War 1 game? I know for BF4 144HZ helped me to play better as a player but that’s because BF4 is a lot more face paced and you have to spray people down etc. Since this game might be a bit more chill and slow paced, would it make a big difference if I played at 4K 60HZ instead of 1440P 144HZ?
I personally would play on 1440 with 144hz, 4k is nice, but the smoothness at 144 outdoes 4k for me
^^^what Pool said.
1440p 144hz all day.
This
Also, 4K without at least 120hz is just a “no” for FPS gaming
pls 4k battlefield !!
I would go with the 144HZ. Out of curiosity what is your 144HZ monitor?
I would prefer you to use the 4K/60Hz so I can increase my KDR if we run into each other on the battlefield.
As most have said already, 1440p 144hz . IMO, The ability to keep it smooth outweighs the benefits of the resolution, especially on desktop monitor.
I really wish Asus or Acer would come out with a 4k IPS panel that wasn’t locked at 60hz already. I also have a 1440p 144hz gsync monitor and love it, but am dying to game at 4k. B)
144hz all day
I’m currently running with a 1440p 165hz GSYNC monitor. Will be using it with BF1 as well.
While 4K looks great… I still don’t find it viable for gaming just yet. Too much power to run smoothly. 1440p looks amazing already and feels great at high refresh rates.
Acer Predator by chance?
Will it be possible to play battlefield 1 on the new playstation neo?
You mean the console that isn’t even confirmed to be real?
I think 1440p 144hz is sweet spot right now
so its still a rumour, google is bursting with news about the playstation neo.
Yup. XB271HU.
Yeah, 1440 @144 is the sweet spot. I enjoy the smoothness and responsivness more than my 44k @60.