64 Players... or more???

Battlefield 1 PC
1

Hope PC gets some love with 50v50 or more!!!

Thoughts

2

thoughts on 50v50 is it would be amazing but only on huge maps, having 50v50 lockers style maps is agony incarnate, but big open scale battles is an exiting premise

3

64 players is the player count

4

If there is no 64 players, its not Battlefield. personal post

5

32v32 … confirmed.

6

I honestly don’t this viewpoint… I wish people would allow for what is fun instead of immediately expecting 64 players.

7

I am not saying that game-modes with less player numbers are not fun at all. I do actually enjoy sometimes games with less than 64 players. I just think that having the 64 option is always good!

8

I know, but forcing 64 players is bad imo. If conquest is bad with 64, don’t use it.

9

I personally want 64 players, because I think it feeds to the epic scale. What I do not want is a cluster mess in choke points and grenade spam or something.

If that was the case and maps are designed smaller, then I want a lower count.

I really want a design model of the following:

  1. When I spawn can I get to the action quickly within reason?
  2. When I get to the action is it a cluster or mess?
  3. When I arrive do I have options for strategy because the maps provides it?
10

Guys it is already confirmed that it is 64 players max. The game details page in Origin even says this.

/end of thread

11

64 max again?!

How can we reenact the Battle of Verdun with this max. cap?!

12

I remember server test with 128 players on PC but not for console.

But 64 players confirmed in the Origin Shop.

13

I don’t think Frostbite/servers are ready for 128 yet. I think they wanted to initially but found that it was just too much to handle without screwing up hit detection etc. I think they made the right move.

14

Removed- Let’s not act like that.

15

While we appreciate your extremely valuable insight… do not post it again. Learn how to be constructive

16

It must be 50v50 considering that typical WW1 battles had alot of infantry in it.

17

It’s confirmed it will 64 players as usual. And why do we need more players? I rather have maps that are designed for 64.

  • Lanky -
18

Aye. I hope servers can be set to 32/48/64 slots by choice too.

19

Yeah but since we have much better PCs (Can handle SWBF maxed out no AA 64 players at 60 FPS. Just tried the trial) They should add more players. 64v64 is the minimum want.

20

I will never understand the obsession with wanting more than 64 players..

Also, @ReDleGiThacK it isn’t just about having better PC’s you also have to take into account RSP hardware. Higher requirements per server instance mean RSP’s have to invest in higher spec hardware, which in turn means the cost for players to rent servers goes up.