With BF4 we`ve got:
1.New graphics.
2.New maps.
3.Levolution.
4.Waves at sea.
With Battlefield One we`ve got:
?
?
?
Nothing new.
Ok. WW1. Old stupid weapons:1-2 shots,need to reload.1-2 shots,need to reload.It`s boring.
At least I want to be able to change landscape (with a shovel to dig tranches,with explosives,etc.),
build a barricade or something.We need full destruction for entire map objects.
Right now this game is BORING.It has no future,it`s another Hardline\Battlefront.
Looks pretty decent to me but will be hard to call until it’s launched.
Worst thing is that even though it’s WWI it plays like every other BF game. No change in pace or mechanics, just a reskin.
You read my mind.
Personally I think it looks amazing, nothing new? Seriously?
Not that I’m defending it or anything, I wasn’t completely sold on the footage I saw, but completely dynamic weather is something we’ve never had before. Also the destruction does genuinely look quite impressive this time around, possibly even more in depth than Bad Company 2 was, given the fact there’s now dynamic vehicle damage based on what parts you hit, again something we’ve never had in Battlefield.
So I don’t think it’s fair to say that it doesn’t bring anything new. What I’m more worried about is the fact that as I was watching the live stream I felt more like I was watching a WW2 game than WW1. There’s too many automatic and semi auto weapons. Which was always going to be the problem, because WW1 didn’t have great weapon diversity, so they either had to remain authentic and keep things mostly based around bolt actions or do what they have done and taken massive liberties with the weapons to make the gameplay more varied. In my opinion, as I’ve said above, the problem with that approach is that is starts to not really feel like WW1 anymore.
And what is so amazing about this game? Can you name at least few unique things?
Fixed it cause you’re either a troll or an idiot.
I like the new spawn system, looks smooth and different.
So we got a few gimmicks, who cares?
So if you don’t like it why are you here? To whine like a baby?
As I’ve never played it I can’t comment on what is so amazing about the game,I said it LOOKS amazing,visually.
But having been a player of battlefield for a very long time I’m freely admitting to being very excited about BF1.
Its just plain to judge an Alpha build of any game…Are you kidding me?
Alpha build of any game is almost finished game,with bugs.
Its not a prototype, its a complete game.
So if you don’t like it why are you here? To whine like a baby?[/quote]
I’m not whining, just giving feedback and I do like what they added, but saying that I we should buy a new game because it has better graphics/effects/destruction is like saying I should buy the same cake I bought for my last 5 birthdays, because it’s got better sprinkles on the top.
I’m not whining, just giving feedback and I do like what they added, but saying that I we should buy a new game because it has better graphics/effects/destruction is like saying I should buy the same cake I bought for my last 5 birthdays, because it’s got better sprinkles on the top.
[/quote]
Oh that was me taking a jab at OP cause look what he lists for new in BF4 and then says nothing new about BF1. I love the grittiness the game brings and just the fact it takes place in WW1.
You are crazy to think that way. The difference between the alpha build and finished product are night and day. The difference between Beta builds and finished products can at times be dramatic.
Can you give me an example please?
Oh that was me taking a jab at OP cause look what he lists for new in BF4 and then says nothing new about BF1. I love the grittiness the game brings and just the fact it takes place in WW1.[/quote]
Oh, well. You quoted me so…
Anyway, the grittiness and overall WWI atmosphere is kinda undone by the Quake-like gameplay.
And this is why they cant please anyone. If they changed too much people would say this is not Battlefield - this is CoD or this is a different game bla bla.
Dice cant win.