Battlefield 1 , Dice / EA suggestions

Battlefield 1 General Discussion
1

Aim Assist slow down should be removed completely

Make the player a bit faster while he aim down the sight ,so he can avoid some shots

Higher Health is preferable

Gun fight has to increase its duration . Gun fight has always been better for other FPS games

Aim & Shoot is just an old generation . Repetitive . Not challenging

All Shooter games are using dodging abilities (Evolve / Cod / Over Watch / Doom / Battlefront / Halo ) .

Note : I hate dodging to be an option on battlefield but I would like to get some thing else to compensate for it

Battlefield has this approach to make everything realistic even at the cost of joyment / challenge / excitement

In Battlefield , it’s so easy to kill the enemy , aim & shoot . There is something has to be done to make it more enjoyable

You can’t even Go prone while shooting your enemy . Why Dice ?

Other games increase the health / other elements to make gun fight more enjoyable / challenging

Second suggestion :

64 Team death match with bigger maps than BF4 . I bit it would have been the best mode in BF4 if it was there

Third :

Operation Locker is probably the best / most played map

All operation locker servers fill up so quickly

Cod players are saying to EA , we love small maps . Please make more small combat maps in BF 1 so we can play the game

Most FPS players love small / medium maps.

Fourth suggestion :

Bring back BF Bad company 2 maps . It was the best maps you have created in the history of BF .

Final suggestion :

More options on rented servers . More variety

  1. server admin is able to prohibit using a weapon (locked )

Would lock C4 / XM25 Air burst / spammable grenades . Etc.

  1. Increase movement speed

  2. filling rented server before random server

Currently , I am renting a server , why you guys don’t promote it

Most of the time my server is not used . Imagine if you promote it by providing a value for us (you would get a shot loads of money ) . Make us happy

2

“Most FPS players love small / medium maps.”
But Battlefield is not some FPS. Battlefield is/was famous for it´s big maps.

“Operation Locker is probably the best / most played map”
U should ask yourself, what kind of players are playing this maps ? What kind of teamplay do i find on those servers ?

“In Battlefield , it’s so easy to kill the enemy , aim & shoot .”
Isn´t that the way u kill someone ?

“Higher Health is preferable”
Yeah, cause 3 headshots (some situations) are not enough…

3

If battlefield want to compete , it has to provide small maps . This is inevitable to the success of the game

It’s not fun to run through the map for 3 minutes just to find one enemy player

If you played battlefield bad company 2 . You would know the changes made was huge in the serious

Adapt to change , big maps will not be preferable by players . Never will be

The reason battlefield exist , is the profit .

If you can make small & big maps you would allow more players to play the game , any one can be interested to get the game . Game value will increase . It’s a win - win strategy

If you make big maps , you are losing the opportunity to be more profitable . I think EA is not thinking clearly , if they don’t learn from their mistakes

Quote : “But Battlefield is not some FPS. Battlefield is/was famous for it´s big maps.”

Not a valid reason not to do it

Quote : ““U should ask yourself, what kind of players are playing this maps ? What kind of teamplay do i find on those servers ?””

Cod players that are playing BF4 usually don’t care about team work . They care about their performance . Their kill / death ratio . Showing off how good they are

You don’t need a team play . You don’t need to classify these people . Every one will play the way they want

4

Taller and wider character models

Allow for half the team to speak to each other two groups of 16. Let us speak to enemies that are within 30 feet of you

In game text chat

Widescreen 21:9 aspect ratio option for consoles

Ability to rest guns on things

Ability to give ammo to team mates without an ammo pack. ie mags

Make it easier spot friends ie different colors

Make maps a with actual cover and complexity. No long sight point for snipers to camp and slow down the flow of a map. Don’t make the maps too big

A separate ranking system that goes up and down based on your score, kills, and playing the objective. It can be activated and deactivated like it titanfall.

Allow users to create their own maps. It would be part of the season pass, so it wouldn’t compete EA’s DLC profits

WW1 retrofitted map versions of shaqari, karkand, wake island, Oman, End of the Line, Harvest Day and. BF2:MC maps. I think it’s seriously underrated by using classic great maps. Nothing makes previous battlefield players want to re-buy a new BF gamethan reliving great memories of old maps.

Smaller maps like BF3’s aftermath need to return. End of the Line and Harvest Day need to return as well. Variety is key.

Restrict the amount of snipers a team can have.

Longer default ticket games. Games start getting really fun at 25 minutes, but then they end. I used to to play max tickets on BF3 all the time, and it was so fun. You can never find max tickets on hardcore.

You shouldn’t receive a death from being team killed. Team killing 4 times gets you an hour long ban.

No more than 5 flags on a map.

64 player count raised (won’t happen though)

5

I hope this is trollbait because you can’t seriously want this .

6

You’re hitting every single check mark for a terrible player.
I don’t want your kind here ruining this game; and neither does anyone else with half a working brain.
I’m sick and tired of the noobs and terrible players turning BF into COD with vehicles.

7

Reloading should be faster. Perhaps make it a progression thing.

8

There’s no reason to not have a variety of maps. BF3’s aftermath maps were perfect. They weren’t even that small. BF2 is outdated. Those maps IMO would work better with a 100 plus player count.

Agree with everything else you responded to.

9

[

Nonsense

I am BF player

Lol . It’s a game . Don’t give it more that it deserves

FYI, I don’t play like a cod players , don’t rush in to judgment . I am just saying give every one the type the want to have

Cod >= 6 * BF player base .

If you want to turn this thing out , small maps & more variety . Simple solution

10

You’re completely missing the point; We Don’t Want the COD players and their toxic community in this game period. Full stop. This catering to those players has hurt this game more than it helps, and dumbing the game down for them is completely asinine and isn’t warranted in the slightest.

11

Have never had to look for a minute to find an enemy except on some of the island maps in conquest, if its a mostly full lobby. Maps are a pretty good size but yes some medium maps would be nice. Never play those close quarters maps its just camping. No talking to enemies that would just get so loud if there were people actually talking and do u wanna give your pos away.
THE WHOLE POINT OF BATTLEFIELD IS BIG CHAOTIC MAPS NO LITTLE COD MAPS.
As said in another thread i just want 99.999% hit register. And less snipin physics so u could kill people easier to make snipers more effective teammates and less of a handicap. Limiting snipers would help kinda but what if i want the snipers gadgets but a carbine. ( what kinda gadgets will they have, a carrier pigeon.) cant call me a sniper anymore. And for people saying no spotting cause thats not authentic. Yes it is theres radio and just plain old yelling

12

As for WWI vamped maps of older BF games. I’m not sure I follow. Are you asking for those maps to be in BF1 but remodeled to look like they fit the era? Or just the maps styles. Because as it stands right now, it comes across, to me at least, that you just want Karknad, Oman, Shaqari and similar classic maps in this game as themselves. Which doesn’t fit or make sense in my book.

13

Is there really dodging abilities in battlefront? If so I must have missed that, also u can shoot whilst prone in bf4 so not sure what ur saying there, didn’t read it all coz I found u confusing!

14

You could add some Mid East style maps, there was the Mesopotamian and Palestine campaign

15

I just want them to add 1 thing:
When something falls in the water, please, please just make it splash.

16

It would be change . But even if it doesn’t

BF BC2 had an expansion pack (vietnam) . Old game for a new game . It was pretty successful . Doesn’t fit u ?

You don’t have to make sense in everything in the game offers . It’s virtual

17

Why do members missing what I am getting ?

Just shoot a gun while you are trying to go prone . There is a delay . You can’t use your weapon for 1.5 seconds appr.

You can’t just shoot wile going to prone at the same time … play COD , you will know what I am talking about

18

You do know that delay is to prevent “drop-shotting” and “dolphin-diving”, right?

19

Some sort of dessert village with the town in the middle and on the outskirts you have farms with open fields and dessert vegetation!

20

Virtual, yes. But it would still be nice for it to be kept in it’s own continuity. Sure, BF:BC2 had a Vietnam DLC. but it was basically an entirely knew Battlefield game.

All I’m saying is that if these types of maps are in. They shouldn’t just be an old-timey spin on Karnad or Oman or so on. It should be local and ideas that fit the war. And if you want a different timeframe dlc like Vietnam. Then it would be perhaps of the Box Rebellion in China, or the Russian Revolution (Which honestly sounds pretty cool to me) but even then, they’d have maps that would fit those settings.

Some maps are cool but even if they are, they shouldn’t be shoe-horned in for having them for having them’s sake.