How would you feel if BF1 was rejected by EA the second time (and final rejection) and never shown, and instead another Modern or Future Battlefield, assuming most people here are excited for bf1..
What do you mean ? I don’t get it.
Young long time no see still running a clan?
I could not be bothered getting it. I learnt my lessons from previous EA titles.
will be for BF1
Yeah definitely I wanted ww2 but I like the idea of a ww1 game since it’s almost never been touched. BTW it’s infidel1105.
if you didn’t know, BF1 was rejected the first time around when it was pitched to EA, but then after some developers fight to get it approved, they was finally given the green light to do BF1.
Anything in the History books is A-OK for me.
There is a contradiction in your statement .If it was never shown then we would never know it was rejected. Nonetheless I would have been disappointed if it turned out to be modern again.
It’s a “What if” and if EA didn’t see what Dice was doing then it would have been rejected anyways, since EA follows the trend in most of their games…untill now, they made a smart decision to go back in time and make a bold move, in which they can breath now since it got more positive feedback then CODs future space themed halo game.
Ah, I wasn’t aware.
Happy they made a little demo for the guys over at EA, and the likes on the YT vid show we’re ready aswell
I wish they’d rejected it this time. I have this feeling that it’s going to feel so gimmicky. Which isn’t particularly down to the time period, although I feel because it’s world war 1 they’ve had to take more artistic liberties to make it work and this will in turn make it feel more goofy and silly than previous battlefields (except Hardline).
I would’ve been pretty “meh” about the game if it was just going to be another modern setting or a futuristic setting. I think the overwhelmingly positive feedback the trailer had means that DICE did something quite right in at least the marketing department.
I would honestly be very disappointed on Dice for going to the future warfare or another modern warfare type game. As we have enough of them and a good change is needed in the current gen we are in. But depending on what it could have been, I may have just gave it a try and if I felt it was like the other games then I would just move on from FPS untill a game came out like what BF1 is like now.
I think if battlefield 1 would be rejected, nobody would know. maybe some years later in an interview with lars or someone else from dice.
How do you know what battlefield 1 is going to be ? And you know there are games allready that are set in world war 1… well for pc there are games https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_I_video_games
how do i know? ummm, did you not read any info on bf1??? and again, people its a “What if?”…obviously we know now but again, what if it didnt come out the way it is now set in WW…& im speaking on console gen, not pc…
I would love for it to be something near 2143. 2142 to me was the best so far and I want a continuation of it! WW1 has me thinking “meh”, may be skipping this title if beta doesn’t wow me.
It should have been rejected.
I would have played it either way. That being said, while I thought the BF1 trailer was amazing I was a little apprehensive about the WW1 setting. It has since opened my eyes to the possibles, and appears to be pointed in the right direction to deliver an experience that is unique and fresh.