lol I was confused for a second. i was like when did I quote this? I never did
Yes, they’ll be back for bfv the cheaters and they’ll get smite again and they will lose interest in the game. People will continue to cheat but it won’t be an epidemic. BF1 had a good anticheat. Wasn’t perfect, but it was good and better than a lot of other popular games out there. By far .
it was in your post of 7.51pm, so with respect you did, but it doesn’t matter
LOLGotYerTags wrote: »
That was not the reason why it was closed at all, It was closed because :
Really? So why not just have something like VAC or whatever?
I mean the system EA uses seems to necessitate some comparatively heavy server-restrictions for anti-cheat that is at most slightly-more effective than otherwise.
VAC is Valve’s so I don’t think it would be easy to use that one without risking exposing their code to a competitor.
FairFight is more than just statistical according to this.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Rainbow6/comments/4476qr/how_fairfight_works_what_it_does_and_what_it/
LOLGotYerTags wrote: »
That was not the reason why it was closed at all, It was closed because :
If the servers are going to be as bad as for BF1 and flooded with high pingers they will be swamped in reports. Just got reported twice, or so they said, in the last game because I hit a couple of flickshots on a pingfrogged server with all out of region nubbins, of course I was a major cheat then, somehow only getting 14 kills and landing on the bottom half of the scoreboard didn’t strike them as somewhat out of character for a cheater. That I hunted a stuttering Assault firing clip after clip with the pistol hitting nothing but air they didn’t see. Long story shorter, better servers will cut down on the erranous cheating reports.