Hello,
Lately I heard that many players don’t like battlefield 4 pace. We can see on videos that Bf 1 is going to be same or even faster. I’m sure if you are serious bf player, (+100h) bf3/4 and bf bc2 you prefer bc2 style where soldiers are heavy. That’s why bc2 was such good game. Am I right?
I’ve got 600+ hours in BF4 and have been regularly playing in the franchise for a while, and I thought the pacing was fine.
I like the movement. But on the other hand im more of a run and gun player. Did you prefer how it was before they increased the speed in BF4?
what pple are saying is not really about speed, but the lack of momentum and the fact that movements cant be anticipated
Honestly Bf4 before movement change was worse but I think it was because netcode.
It looks the same to me as i play BF4. We’ll find out whenever the beta comes out.
Each person has their own idea of what is better. There is a great amount of people who think that the pace is just right. Although if one could make a game preset that has that change in movement speed. Either that they slow the speed of the soldier or add a stamina system.
Well when you compare Battlefield to games like Rainbow 6 siege, then yes it is a rather fast paced game.
I wouldn’t really care if BF1 stays the pace it is now or if the game got slowed down slightly, as long as the game doesn’t get any faster than it currently is. If BF1 gets any faster it’ll feel to much like CoD.
I personally like the idea of a stamina system, and I think Dice has unknowingly made it in BF1. When you watch the pre-alpha footage, the Bayonet charge is a very, VERY fast sprint. However, you can only do it for about 5-6 seconds, allowing you to quickly get behind cover to be safe from a tank or Jeep.i f they were to do the same thing to regular sprinting (although I hate to say it, like COD), I think it would balance the movement system.