Lol as much as edgelords don’t like it popularity is GENERALLY indicative of some kind of talent. Especially when they come from humble beginnings. I don’t like wiz or snoop, but to call them awful stretching it quite a ways.
yeah. rebecca black, bieber, taylor swift. So much talent. something being popular means it has pop or mainstream appeal, and not that it’s somehow good.
Just as a matter of interest. Did WW1 only take place in Europe? (The clue is in the question for those not that knowledgeable) If not then those arguing against black soldiers have been also arguing ‘Yes, they had black soldiers elsewhere’ So, DICE shouldnt use the characters that are going to play throughout the game in other theaters of war that took place. e.g. Africa? just because the map was in Europe?
OP and some have issues with the color of people skin apparently.
Both sum up this issue perfectly plus, ‘it is a game’ actually is a valid argument.
Let’s face it, on pure percentage terms, there would be no ‘ethnic minorities’ represented as ‘white european’ (British Commonwealth and German equivalent included) make up the vast majority of combatants in WW1. Even 'muricans wouldn’t make it on pure percentage terms.
Irrespective of historical accuracy that would be wrong in modern times.
Everyone is talking about about these percentages though as if it is a bad thing that so many 'ethnic minorities ’ are represented with some complete, total and utter Bellsniff suggesting that it is a disgrace and an affront to the memory of ‘white’ people who died.
Consider this:
Perhaps DICE included so many ‘ethnic minorities’ to honour as many races and religions that participated in and died during WW1 as possible.
We also don’t know if this was a representation sample of character customisation that *may be available *in the full game which was not in the alpha and unlikely to be in the beta.
You can dress this up as ‘historical inaccuracy’ as much as you like, but if you have an issue with this, your motives are suspect.