Only smokey blood effects like all the other ones? We need some guts coming out and stuff like that.
I Agree with the gas, but dont really need guts coming out.
Sure Would be cool to shoot off legs and so like in (oh lord) cod 5. And maybe some more blood would not hurt, but i dont mind if There is no guts.
Agreed.I don’t really care for lots of gore,but at least an occasional dismemberment should happen.
Don’t need unnecessary things like gore.. But yeah the gas needs to be more visible..
I would agree with OP. I woudn’t mind a little more.
Why are people so obsessed with blood and gore? Does it really detract anything from the game if it doesn’t have blood and guts spilling everywhere? Didn’t people grow out of that phase when they turned 15?
It may be WW1 but it’s also Battlefield. So there will be no gore. Also, this installation already seems to have way more blood than the rest.
The war was brutal.
Maybe because the war was especially brutal and it’s a video game? There are ways for gore to be added without messing with gameplay and having little kids cry.
IMO there needs to be more for Artillery/tank shells and the effects of gases.
Just something that makes it look more authentic.
Also the Battlefield games have been rated M, so there is nothing holding them back in terms of ratings wise that means that they can’t do more realistic gore and effects.
I’m not talking about over-the-top gore, just more authentic affects depending on what happens. If a character literally gets hit by an arty round you shouldn’t simply fall over and that’s that.
So in what way does more blood and gore make the experience better? So you can see more red pixels on your screen?
The amount of blood on screen currently is a conscious art decision. Battlefield doesn’t need more gore to be a better game and more gore doesn’t instantly make games feel more immersive. Of all the things to worry about, blood effects aren’t very high on the dev’s to do list, and it shouldn’t be as big a concern as people make it out to be either.
If the game has more gore than i would like i won’t buy it. If you want gore then there are plenty of other games out there.
Gore isn’t necessary for a game like this, of course.
Frankly, a lot of things aren’t necessary.
But for a game like this, why WOULDN’T you want additional effects? It just adds more visceral elements to the experience.
RO2 is a great example. That game, after an hour or two, can really suck you in especially if you had planned on having a hard gaming session. When you’re sucked in and you’re tuckered up behind cover and then you suddenly see a body part fly over next to you from the other side of the wall after a grenade went off; that intense.
It adds so much more to the experience; little nuances. Those little things add up to a lot in games like these.
I vote more gore.
It doesn’t have to be animated rivers of blood and intestines, but certainly dismemberment and some bloody chunks as well as pools of blood in trench points.
That good?Good show btw.
The amount of obsession some of you guys have for seeing gore boggles my mind.
maybe just heads blowing up on headshots
Not gonna happen
^^^^
Does nobody ever take into account what gore would do to the revive mechanic? If a guy gets blown apart by any little explosive or heavy round shot (which there are a lot of in BF), what happens to the revive?
Either you’re going to revive the guy and he’s going to magically have all his guts and pieces glue back in to place (What will you revive? His foot? His head?) - or you’re not going to be able to revive at all and everyone is going to spam explosives in CQ to prevent enemy players from being revived and saving a ticket.
Both options sound horrible, just like the suggestion to include gore.
I think the BF franchise has done fine without it.