I really hope someone else starts making game’s like battlefield there not very good at making their own game anymore … Spawn in only 2 tanks wow watch in the next battlefield there will be no tanks
You played the other 6 maps already? Im pretty sure some will have more then 2 tanks per team…
Youre still not completely wrong,vehicles in bf3 and 4 were MUCH more fun to play and also to play against. Tanks had massive firepower but a good engineer could solokill them in a few secs. Planes were much harder to master and no infantry farming tools. Vehicles did really go downhill…i hoped for bf4 style vehicles just without lockons,but its more like bf1 but even slower.
Well, you can’t say that BF is a vehicle game anymore. It’s more or less an infantry game with some vehicles. I can only see 1 or maybe 2 maps that will have more than 2 tanks.
They should have spent more time on creating more vehicles maps instead of a ridiculous assigment and unlock / upgrade system.
Well the most played maps in all BFs did not involve too many vehicles. The idea is combined arms and the mayhem of some BF4 maps should not be repeated. Can you recall being the only poor idiot on Dragon Valley that did not get a vehicle? Horrible.
You are forgetting that each map has additional spawns that can be used. The squad call-ins. So that would put Rotterdam on two vehicles per side at least. I do not know if there is a timer on these things, or if every squad can spawn a Sturmtiger at any time. So you could be looking at up to 9 tanks on Rotterdam.
Likely? No, but in the end you can say there is one more vehicle on every map because of that system.
Thing is those 2 maps in the beta didn’t really need anymore vehicles,it would have turned into a vehicle fest.like the second poster said we haven’t even seen much of the other maps yet.i get your point but lets just wait and see what happens.
EA tested how little they can put into a game and still make a profit in star wars it seems to be the business model these days minimal effort maximum profit.
I’m concerned about this live service model it has given dice a get out of jail free card to release an unfinished game on the grounds that they will add more later. A big chunk of what is advertised as part of the game at launch is to be added later. Which they will likely pass off as live service updates.
Dice has probably already finished the content for the vanilla game months ago, and have just been working to get a good head start on the Tides of War content.
Sometimes, more is less. Keep it simple, make sure it works… Most everyone will love it.
I’ve said before, the worst thing to have happened to Battlefield is DICE. Or, maybe it’s EA.
DICE have been a sell-out studio for about their entire existence. They’ve always been looking to compromise their games and to make them ever more dumbed down to chase dollars from the lowest-common-denominator crowd.
There is little to nothing to be proud about in a game like Battlefield 1, considering where Battlefield has been in titles like Battlefield 2 and Battlefield 4.
Battlefield 4 is the 2nd worst game in the series. Battlefield 1 is the best battlefield game dice has made since 1942. Battlefield 1 makes you feel like your on a real battlefield warzone. No other game from dice has achieved that. The review scores back that up as well compared to other battlefield game.
Don’t play it then?
the bigger problem I’ve noticed (with BF:1 and BF:4) is that the maps/content gets old really quickly.
With BF4 this was because a lot of the maps were apparently designed for 7th generation consoles (Xbox-360 and PS3), in addition to the relatively new/untested PS4 and Xbone
In part I think this is due to the way it’s implemented, and is one of the reasons I’m in favor of that barbaric notion of faction-weapon/gadget-restrictions. (or at least weapon/gadget-restrictions based on/changing with the map).. if you’re more or less forced to use different equipment with different pros/cons every round, there’s less of a chance you’ll end up growing completely bored of them.
Just lol.
Spoken like a true fanboy.
.
They literally called their fanbase uneducated and are putting out a barely finished product with the “promise” of stuff that is supposed to be at launch to come later, and the fanboys will STILL buy the game.
BF4, and BF1 only? Alrighty then.
I didn’t have this multiplayer account until BF4.
.
I’ve played since BF1942 was first released in 2002, and for BF2 and BF3, I played under a different name, so don’t try to pull that ‘Well, your account only lists BF4 and BF1’.
Bf1 had 24 primaries at release, so dont know what you talking about. 30 is enough for start.
8 maps is not huge, but we should get during january/february 2 new Greece maps plus probably more weapons aswell.
They’ve made changes to the vehicles since the Beta, but we haven’t seen them yet. They said they were going to make them faster. Guess we’ll find out on launch day.
I’m just glad Tanks are powerful again.
BF1 had less weapons if you don’t include the tanker/pilot ones.
BF1942 had 10 weapons (and no garand, might I add)
Lot of complaining for a new type of service model that we haven’t seen in action yet. A very different type of model where you no longer pay for additional maps and weapons.
And we really haven’t seen/played the other maps yet.
Also recall that one of the earlier Battlefield games had a similar so called issues. They later provided a large map pack with plenty of vehicles in it. Of course you had to buy the dlc to play them. Now you won’t.
For now it is really and see before you have a legitimate complaint.