So I’ve read a ton of other threads - some interesting, some not on my radar of concerns for bf1. I thought I would pose a thread on the most important aspect to me…gameplay
Do you prefer something closer to BF4, more tactical like AA (sans the 1 death and wait), or more arcade like BattleFront - or something in between.
My opinion I hope they improve the BF4/BF3 gameplay style and follow that path.
Curious as to what everyone else wants.
That’d be cool to have a game ode for 1 death and wait til end of round but for the entire game no I wouldn’t want that. Especially if you’re lone wolfing that’d be a nightmare.
That would be different for a BF title for sure. I asked this question question b/c I think it is funny when people major on the minors of a game like people screaming in FIFA because the cleats/boots didn’t match the persons footwear in real life yet.
play rainbow 6 siege
can a moderator on an EA site recommend Ubisoft games!? j/k - those are good games
I like siege a lot, and it is exactly what he is asking for.
it is just one of those things i don’t see happening in a battlefield title. look at defuse in bf4 or rescue/vip in hardline… they didn’t do so well
I am not a fan of it, it turns into a hide/snipe party - I prefer conquest in Battlefield Titles
BF4 isn’t “tactical”, it’s an arcade shooter. Not as much as SWBF, but still very “arcadey”..
Agreed - that is why I placed it in the middle of AA and BattleFront. It has some tactical aspects that are great when people play as a team. Plus this being WWI mass arcade chaos might ensue.
I use to play a lot of socom 2 back in the day. Those maps where fairly big but no vehicles. I agree that kinda game mode wouldn’t survive on this game.
he’s not directly employed by EA for one, and even the DICE devs talk about playing other games. you can promote one game while liking others.
Disallowed!
