Hello all I have a 4790k @ 4.5ghz play at 1080p yes I know my card is overkill but I want to know if anyone has the same res and what fps your getting cause at some points in bf1 when there’s a lot of stuff going on I drop to about 90!
I have same CPU 4.6 and stock gpu mine is a msi gaming x. I play at 1440p tho. Full ultra i range from 110-144 and CPU 68-72%. I prefer higher fps so I turn post processing down medium and get 130-164 fps .Driver 381.25 I think.. I have a 1080p monitor also I’ll check later tonight . I can not get my gpu to go past 90% on bf1?? Anyways good luck
Ok let me know thank you!
Link to section: I also have a 4790k @ 4.6hz and a msi 1080ti gaming x. I get around 110-140fps at 1440p. I added the lines to the user.cfgI also have a 4790k @ 4.6hz and a msi 1080ti gaming x. I get around 110-140fps at 1440p. I added the lines to the user.cfg
Link to section: Thread.ProcessorCount 8 Thread.MaxProcessorCount 8 Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 1Thread.ProcessorCount 8
Thread.MaxProcessorCount 8
Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 1
Before doing this my minimum fps would drop to 100 fps on certain maps. I don’t notice a difference in the high or average fps but the game feels smoother when tons of explosions are happening. I am not positive if it is a placebo effect though.
You’re only getting 110-140fps with the 1080ti? That sounds low.
Or if I got a 7700k would it be better
This is what I suspected all along even a 1080 ti or the titan x cannot hold 144 fps constant @full ultra preset no lowering of settings with no drops and that’s at 1080 p . It’s quite amazing how much resources this game can devour regardless of what you throw at it .
The game is rather CPU limited, 1080p isnt a problem for a 1080ti.
I know right .any gtx 1080 or above ie ti titan x should absolutely crush ultra at 1080 p on bf1 it’s pretty bad on the games part at how it utilises resources
Well for solid 144 you would probably want atleat a Skylake K i7 or even a hexacore. But most people that complain here have some issues with their systems, its not necessarily always the game.
at 1080p your GTX1080ti will be working at 50% maximum, you are not working it hard enough . You will probably find pushing the res scale up (or upping your true resolution) will not lose you any frames but the game will look great .You could probably run the game at 4k above 60fps without drops
No that’s at 1440p. At least that is what I am running. Usually average around 140ish. Will dip down lower on certain maps when there are tons of explosions going around. If I am flying I will often see 200fps. I mean rendering a blue screen (the sky) doesn’t take much resources.
Damn, I have 4790k with 980 TI SLI and my computer literally SHATS on everyone’s numbers here… both on my 1920x1080p 144hz and my 3440x1440 100hz. I was really looking into getting a 1080 TI but now I am not sure considering this is one of the games I would be getting it for…
It’s a placebo.I’ve tried that with no FPS gain.You basically tell the game to use all of your CPU Cores with no Performance gain.Mine CPU get’s stressed at 100% all the time (4930K 4.4Ghz) on an empty server lol.When i remove those “lines”, CPU usage lowers but same FPS is the same. Go ahead, test it and let me know.
Also are you using Dual Channel for your memory or Single?Post your full specs. I have a friend of mine with 4790k at 4.6ghz, 16gb (2x8gb) 2400mhz cl 11, gtx 1070 gigabyte xtreme edition, game on SSD , win10 with latest updates, and his game runs above 120-180 fps all the time(some settings on medium, some on low) .No dips nothing.
Exactly what I was saying. No difference in average and high fps but noticeable difference in lowest fps. Obviously you won’t get that in an empty server. Try again in a full 64 server on an fps intensive map like empires edge. I only tested it back to back in 2 maps - empires edge and giants shadow. So I can’t say conclusively whether or not it makes a significant difference though.
Never dropped frames below 100 with my gtx 1080 + 6700k 4.5ghz @ 1080p. Idk, probably Haswell already showing its age.
I get the same and I’m still on X-58 Xeon [email protected] 1080p & Gtx 1080 sc oced. Those extra two cores make all the diff for me. So if you think something’s showing it’s age ,drop a hex core in that puppy. 1366 is going to last until x299 has a decent hexcore.,and the bugs worked out. Now that is what I call longevity. Little bit of a bottle neck in the pci 16 lane but not enough to be concerned about.
Of course thats off the subject of the 1080ti which I’ll drop on here soon enough from a step up.
4790k 4.4Ghz 1080Ti hybrid [email protected] 90/110 fps
The reason there isnt a big fps dip for the higher resolutions is because higher res’s only require GPU grunt so although you are playing at a higher res the cpu is still being taxed the same. This is why ppl with older cpu’s are seeing low gpu utilisation @ 1080p
If you arent getting a cpu bottleneck anywhere your gpu’s should be running at 100% utilisation which they arent until you up the res or the res scale, take a look at the in game performance graph. it should look like this;
I have a 1080Ti and i7 [email protected] Mostly runs between 80-145fps @ 1440p ultra…although I do get some dips to 70fps in extremly busy 64 player matches, especially on the soissons map.
Having read this thread with claims of never dipping below the 100 mark..I must have something really wrong with my system…