Which check would you rather have deposited to your bank account, a dollar for every “casual” BFV player, or a dollar for each “competitive” player? Given the obvious nature of the answer, why would you expect EA to not feel exactly the same?
Is ‘Casual’ synonymous with ‘bad’ now? If so, why is it so stigmatised?
Everyone and anyone is welcomed to play the game. I don’t care if you’re a 50 y.o battle-hardened hardcore vet or a 10 y.o casual skrub, just as long as you aren’t toxic.
Would kill for 2142 on frostbite. After the first few patches it was quite balanced yet could still be perceived as asymmetrical. Someone go get me my Voss
No. This game is designed by and for the competitive mindset. Just take a look at the upcoming 5v5 competitive mode with exclusive maps, gadgets, soldier skins. However, aren’t we all causal players who are looking for more 64p maps with more authentic WWII atmosphere?
BFV is imo for no one since almost the entire community has some serious gripes with the game.
“casuals” find the TTK too fast or other flaws in this unfinished game
“core”-fans or whatever you want to call them find the animations to be too infringing or general balance being worse then its ever been
the list is endless and support for BFV will drop faster then the bombs in WW2 did
EA/Dice has made every imaginable mistake and is fighting a lost war imo.
Once confidence is lost and the rumor is out in the street, there is rarely any way back.
They may have come to the same conclusion when we look at the current road map.
My guess would be that they put all ressources in the next BF and just enough ressources to keep BFV alive.
But imo live service is now just an empty word from the past without any content.