every battlefield had a decent killcam..some players here are confused with other games prob. anyway killcam is fine. a recon should change spots, an assault and medic should always flank and a support with or without bipod should be ready to defend his patrol area. the only people are whining about killcam are the people who camp every class prone behind rocks or walls and spam/abuse semi autos or bipods. this game is not hardcore. if hardcore mode comes eventually it will be good without killcam. dont mix everything up. normal elements with hardcore this game is already a mess we dont need mixed things. ps t bagging is on
also in pc me personally i need the killcam to know who killed me. a lot of aimbotters are on a lot of servers. in other games you have replay of matches for this reason. in bf we have killcam. if we even had a damage model with a bodybthat shows where the bullets went would be perfect too
i’ve logged 250 hours and it feels fine. ia it ur first bf? cause its the usual killcam that bf had in almost all games. in bf 1 and bf 4 was more detailed where the eny player was
Kill cam is not fine. It nerfs the recon and support playstyle. Incase you are not aware of this, but there is a plethora of guns in game that REQUIRE you to be prone to use effectively. The only way to go prone and set up kills is to predict the path of the enemy, often through camping.
The issue now (I cant believe I have to explain this) is that Assault and Medic classes can easily know where the Support or Recon player is to retaliate after a respawn, which can happen in as little as 5 seconds (if their squad is nearby).
Kill cam is a huge nerf to a playstyle that many support and recon players have used over the years.
this is not battlefield V hardcore. this is battlefield every battlefield had killcam. dont cry about how you cant camp. today i was playing in hamada recon in breakthrough and i did 50 10 so is it a nerf on recon? i know how to move through the map i dont need a kill cam to see where the enemy killed me last time to kill him. also a lot of guys i killed never retaliated back. why though? the kill cam didnt show where i was? also with assault on rotterdam flanked every point and it was succesful without killcam being a problem for my killstreak or flank.
The crying about killcam is about camping admit it. everyone wants to build up their kd by cheap kills in cheap places. the good players still play good with or without killcam.
What I do and don’t want is beside the point, you’re still wrong about what you posted, I stopped reading after “every battlefield had a decent killcam..some players here are confused with other games prob.” and if you actually did start with 1942, you would know just how wrong it was and probably wouldn’t be a big fan of kill cams in the first place.
killcams lile this werw introduced im bf series since bf bc2. in previous bfs still had a killcam with who killed u and with what. unless u are all battlefield veterans i dont see the bad point on killcams as they never bothered me. you guys should cry for more important things instead of stupid things like killcam. start crying with class balance so we can see a change in superclass aka assault
You seem to be the one doing all the crying though, crying about how good the kill cam is and crying at players that don’t want it or like it in their game.
I honestly don’t remember there being a kill cam in BC2 but it was a great game never the less and the kill feed on previous titles ain’t the same as a kill cam, just saying.