Battlefield 2 maps were large and by using this technique the game decreased the number of things that needed to be rendered.
There are certain maps where it does limit the distance of sight to a certain distance and it therefore limits snipers to that distance as enemies were not rendered past that distance. (If you were pro you could kill enemies beyond that distance)
Battlefield 1 is not hardware limited in that way but will still make use of the fog as a dynamic weather aspect which serves to render snipers useless at certain distances unless you are pro and can use the fog to hide your scope glint and still workout where the enemy is relative to the 3D spotting.
Battlefield 2 maps were large and by using this technique the game decreased the number of things that needed to be rendered.
There are certain maps where it does limit the distance of sight to a certain distance and it therefore limits snipers to that distance as enemies were not rendered past that distance. (If you were pro you could kill enemies beyond that distance)
Battlefield 1 is not hardware limited in that way but will still make use of the fog as a dynamic weather aspect which serves to render snipers useless at certain distances unless you are pro and can use the fog to hide your scope glint and still workout where the enemy is relative to the 3D spotting.
Not getting in the middle of the fog debate, as I participated in many of them during BF2’s golden days and they ended up pointless - but I will add that fog sucks a fat one.
I have a lot of opinions about Battlefield as a game in general, just like everyone else that plays BF. Just because I’m more vocal about them and enjoy talking about the game just as much as I enjoy playing it doesn’t mean anything.
Obviously, by the response you edited out, you seemed to care enough about me “not being good” to write a lengthy response about it explaining that my “not being good” entailed that my opinion held lesser value. But again, way to edit out to save that ***, my man.
oh yeah i agree, just bored some readers, but it doesn’t mean anything.
What i have to tell you: sorry?
Ok, sorry loqtrall.
But im convinced that a bad player cant have a good opinion, as well i think that a kid or a sniper haters are not good players like you, that is the OP argument.
Are you assuming I’ve never seen my own stats page?
I also played on PC for less than an hour, on a friend’s PC that could barely handle the game on low (just because I literally wanted to see how bad it was - it was pretty bad). I play BF4 on Xbone, I have no reason to play it on PC.
My stats are pretty above average for someone that literally only uses sniper rifles in CQB, with a silencer.
Implying someone’s opinion doesn’t matter because they have worse stats than you makes you look like a dunce.
You dont know the Battlefield games, because you don’t play so much to talk in EACH TOPIC, please stop yourself is ridiculous, you make ridiculous yourself.
