it is not their fault, blame the mode you are playing.
it is down to ea to give us decent maps with paths that you can take to flank around the map, and add buildings to take cover from snipers.
this was only available on the domination mode that ea took offline 
maybe if you all moaned about domination being taken offline, you would have a better experince playing infrantry 
Domination was still full of prone bi-pod boomer morons. It’s partly the fact that the game accommodates these milsim idiots in it’s design, but also partly the fact that these single-digit IQ peons elect to play the game in the first place.
So no, I’ll continue to moan about them all I want thanks 
And many of us will continue to laugh at your posts wherein you show how much you hate the diversity of playstyles bf allows.
Well snipers are noobs if they dont stay in the sector that we must capture/defense.
Like in breakthrough. And if they stay far away from the objectives. The flares wouldn’t be usefull or the spawn beacon.
It’s better if they fight in the sector with iron sight and use glare/beacon
A conscious choice to play in a hillhumpingstairwelldwellingbushwookiecamping playstyle is made by the players…
But hasn’t this always been part of BF!? The only addition BFV has made is that of the cornerMMGproner.
there are many ways in domination to flank somebody who is prone.
you can also smoke them out
Agreed. Map design is awful. Its the main reason for the sniper and mmg complaints. Rotterdam and Devestation are the only ones that I think are decent but that’s subjective.
i think both of us agreeing, and not blaming snipers or campers shows we are actually pin pointing the problem.
this is more constructive than, most comment on here.
even though your play style is to blame but okay, + map design.
On pc game infested snipers : they camp border maps. No problem with bi-pod