It’s called Battlefield 4. Scopes, parachutes, AKs, M4s, Lock ons. LMGs. Grenade launchers. Air burst. That’s just a partial list of based somewhat on thread topics here. Can you not see this?
If you want this stuff so bad, then play BF4. It’s exactly what you want. And thanks to you, BF1 will be what you want it to be.
I seriously noticed the same thing. People are urging for “something new” yet wish for the same. So stupid it makes my eyes bleed.
I agree.
I think some gamers are hoping that BF1 turns out to be the BF4 that they’ve always wanted but never got.
Seems that way^
Thank you for agreeing with me you all. I was wondering if I was waaay off base. Guess not lol.
This is the thing with gamers now. They say all day they want something different, yet Call of Duty sells MILLIONS of copies every year that is the same game with little tweaks here and there.
While I enjoy COD every few years, I see no reason to buy it every time, because I actually want something different.
It is sick how messed up gamers’ views are
Then buck the trend. Dice has a golden opportunity to reset the system. See who’s a real near mil sim (as much as you try to deny it, that’s what Battlefield strives to be) gamer and who’s a Call of Duty quick scop guy. That’s why so many of my friends were stoked to hear WW1. Finally a true historical non WW2 game. If they just capitulate to the 12 year olds, the cycle you rightly stated above, will continue.
I actually don’t want any of that.
I do want automatics but I want them big, clunky, slow and inefficient.
And I will enjoy using my Enfeild rifle. That .303 is a nice round
lol, Battlefield has never once tried to be a milsim game. ARMA is a milsim, battlefield is an arcade FPS just like call of duty. It has always been like that, and I don’t see it changing
Really? Huh. Cause I’ve heard the opposite from CoD guys. And I was one of them. It doesn’t the have to be ARMA. It needs to be not CoD. That’s all.
It isn’t COD, it is a sandbox multplayer shooter… which is not what COD is. COD has no vehicles and is a straight infantry-centric arcadey FPS. If anyone calls BF a realistic shooter, they need meds because they have some serious mental issues.
Well said
It’s hell of a lot more realistic than CoD. There are laser weapons in development, but they aren’t in BF4. Reason is, it would be dumb to put them in. Look at the reponses to this thread. About all that’s needed.
It may be more realistic, but it by no means makes Battlefield realistic. Being more realistic than COD isn’t hard at this point in where they are going for setting.
COD isn’t aiming for realism.
Neither is BF for that matter.
Video games, people. We’re talking about video games.
Some people live through video games it seems.
Exactly, lets create BF4 in WWI I’m sure that would be fun.
Nope…
People wan’t realism… until it becomes realistic and bores you to death. See 90% of vanilla ARMA 3. That game is booooooooooring without mods
Well that what some 12 year olds seem to want and is supported by many here.