Weapon damage on the realistic side ?

[zePokar1]

@Preemoose

@CMBELITE_

@Peccath

@CMBELITE_

@Peccath

@DannyTanner17

I think the longer TTK is what separates BF from COD (except for Hardline). With so many weapons with a lower ROF, some compensation in BF1 will be necessary, but I hope it isn’t like COD or Hardline. There are many reasons why so many players have stuck with BF4 over BFH and I think this was one of them. If too many weapons instakill in normal matches, then we might as well be playing hardcore.

I love longer TTK. Nothing’s better than get being shot at the back and then just do an evasive maneuver while turning around and land few headshots on the enemy and kill him. Happens a lot on Normal, not so much on Hardcore…

yeah but that’s totally unfair and unrealistic, a WWI soldier that takes a enfield bullet anywhere was pretty much out of fight

Again, that’s what the Hardcore preset is for. Anyway, how is that unfair? I don’t get it. The better player wins even if taken by surprise from behind.

it’s unfair because if you compare to real life, if you get hit first, you have less chance to win the fight no matter how skilly you are.

you can see video where a marine got shot by a SVD in the armour plate and was out of combat even if his firing skill was maybe better than the SVD guys.

In BF you can get shot in the back, hide behind cover, wait for your health to increase or use a medit kit and then kill the enemy that shot you first as he was approaching toward your location to see if you were down

IRL if you die once, you cannot respawn.

That’s what they should do. When you purchase the game you have one life. If you die you have to purchase a new life as DLC.