Plays on ps3
1.3 kd, 0.6 kpm,1500 flag captures or so..
Flames you
Claims recons are actually useful
Battlefield “veteran”
Yep,a recon in a nutshell.Cod player on ps that bought bf4 to camp on a hill and make mlg montages
Thanks for the laugh,and for the extra name in my ignore list
You’re going to stat bash me? LMAO. Grow up kid.
My overall stats don’t show you or anybody anything because I let my fiance play as well as friends when they’re over to my house. Also countless matches where I was too intoxicated to be effective at anything. I’m not the only one using that account nor am I always giving my 100% when in game, because I don’t care that much. I’m not trying to be a “professional” in video games.
I’ve played every single Battlefield except Bad Company 1 and BF2142. Just because I didn’t go through the hassle of linking all my profiles to show off my useless Vet status suddenly I’m a CoD expat??
I don’t even play on PS3 unless I’m playing BF3. I play BF4 on PS4.
I will call you out though when you’re being an irrational child.
Most Recons are worthless hill humping bush wookies who do nothing for the team. Before you ask what makes me an expert I’m ranked #650 in the recon kit with a 1200 spm and almost 8000 flags caped.
I told you, I’m eons better with sniper rifles than with carbines. I kill people frequently with sniper rifles in CQB while they use automatic weapons, simply because I’m more accurate than them.
I don’t need more bullets and a faster rate of fire. I guarantee if I was using a carbine in that match we were talking about that I posted above, I wouldn’t have gone 48-15. I would have got caught up trying to burst fire someone with a , inaccurate carbine, and they’d probably have killed me - because I rely on precision because accuracy is my greatest attribute (literally in the game, out of all my stats).
I would rather rely on my 40+% accuracy with sniper rifles than my 15-20% accuracy with carbines.
Also, your “it’s only good if you can hit the head” logic is completely unfounded, as you can kill anyone with an OHK to the chest from 40 feet away (12m), which is well within the range I usually engage people. I literally can’t tell you how many times I’ve no-scoped people in direct CQB who were trying to spray me down spastically. If they’re using the defensive perk, I’ll more than likely be able to hit them a second time or pull out my sidearm and down them before they can hit me - again - because the general playerbase is inaccurate as hell.
I don’t need a carbine to be effective at PTO, nor in CQB. What you’re essentially telling me to do is use a crutch. I’m assuming most of your argument is coming from the fact that you’re probably terribly inaccurate with sniper rifles in general, let alone in CQB.
Yeah that might work in xbone where most players are eating doritos on their couchand dont even use ads.Try doing cqb with a bolt on Pc against people with autos and everyone using defensive.
I guess i should check the platform before i do balance discussions from now on
…implying that I don’t and have never played on PC?
It’s sad that people blame others for their failures. That one recon on that hill wasn’t ptfo and you lost? Don’t blame him. Blame yourself and the other 30 people on your team.
A guy in your team did absolutely nothing to contribute?
Blame the guys that actually did contribute
I love the logic of useless hill campers
It’s called a team effort. If your team lost, it wasn’t solely because of one guy camping on a hill, it’s because your team sucked in comparison to the other team.
Look at the bottom of the scoreboard in any given match - and you’ll see players of every class that are just as worthless as the “hillhumping” sniper.
You are a piece of work aren’t you?
How come you lost then? How would one extra body besides drain tickets everytime they died help you? If you and 30 other players can’t cap and hold flags for a win, I’d start looking where you could improve not blaming it on a recon.
Put in back in the deck. I’m the most active player you could find in a match. You’d think my character has ADHD.
Pretty sure a team consists of individuals.And if an individual is not contributing you can blame him as well for the bad performance of the team
If you dont help ptfo then you deserve blame in case of loss.Dont justify hill camping
I didn’t say you don’t blame him as well, I said THE WHOLE TEAM is to blame - that means literally everyone on the team. Again, it’s called TEAM effort. The blame of loss falls on the entire team - just because you PTFO during the match doesn’t make you exempt from taking on part of the loss as well.
Trying to put the brunt of the blame on 1 person out of a 32 person team is just stupid.
Of course you dont blame the whole team.You only.blame the guys who dont ptfo.Because the team who wins is the one with the most guys that ptfo
Why would you blame people who cap flags and basically did what they could when others might just be sitting 1000m away.
Because they’re a part of the team. When a football team loses a game, they don’t blame the loss on just the players that didn’t score TDs. They don’t blame the loss on defensive players that didn’t intercept the ball, or players that didn’t catch their pass. It’s a team effort, and the entire team feels the loss.
Putting the blame on others just makes you look like a child that’s mad because they didn’t win.
You fail to realize that a team is just a sum of people.
Yes in a football team you blame the ones who didnt do their job.If a defense player didnt defend,you blame him along with other people who didnt fullfil their roles.You dont blame messi that scored 2 goals because he was in the team that lost
Ofc you dont blame only one person specifically,but you can distinguish the players that caused the loss.Which usually is everyone at the bottom half of the scoreboard
Bane of the scout class: maps without hills
There is nothing wrong with the recon class. Either learn how to play the aggressive recon or do more spotting.
You’re acting like those who PTFO are flawless, that they don’t have faults in the match simply because they capped a few objectives or defended a few objectives. There’s more than likely not one game that goes by that you didn’t make a mistake that may or may not have cost your team an objective point.
There is blame to put on everyone, everyone makes mistakes that are blame-worthy, even those that contribute directly to the team effort.
Again, you’re not just magically exempt from blame for a loss just because you capped some objectives, and the brunt of the blame doesn’t lie on the few people per match that cap no objectives. For the third time in this thread - at the bottom of the scoreboard there are people of ALL classes that are horrible, whether they’re contributing or not. The horrible player doesn’t get exempt from blame just because he may have capped ONE objective.
I’ll take a guy that suxxx who at least tries to be productive over a guy that humps grass.
TIL not capping flags or helping cap them does not mean you contributed to the teams loss.
Another quality piece of advice brought to you by hill campers inc.